Cited by 22Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Medication adherence behaviors of Medicare beneficiaries

Open access
Carr-Lopez, Shek, Allen, Lastimosa, Janine, Patel, Rajul, Woelfel, Joseph, Galal, Suzanne, Gundersen, Berit·2014·Patient Preference and Adherence

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is crucial for positive outcomes in the management of chronic conditions. Comprehensive medication consultation can improve medication adherence by addressing intentional and unintentional nonadherence. The Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit has eliminated some cost barriers. We sought to examine variables that impact self-reported medication adherence behaviors in an ambulatory Medicare-beneficiary population and to identify the factors that influence what information is provided during a pharmacist consultation. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who attended health fairs in northern California were offered medication therapy management (MTM) services during which demographic, social, and health information, and responses to survey questions regarding adherence were collected. Beneficiaries were also asked which critical elements of a consultation were typically provided by their community pharmacist. Survey responses were examined as a function of demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors. RESULTS: Of the 586 beneficiaries who were provided MTM services, 575 (98%) completed the adherence questions. Of responders, 406 (70%) reported taking medications "all of the time". Of the remaining 169 (30%), the following reasons for nonadherence were provided: 123 (73%) forgetfulness; 18 (11%) side effects; and 17 (10%) the medication was not needed. Lower adherence rates were associated with difficulty paying for medication, presence of a medication-related problem, and certain symptomatic chronic conditions. Of the 532 who completed survey questions regarding the content of a typical pharmacist consultation, the topics included: 378 (71%) medication name and indication; 361 (68%) administration instructions; 307 (58%) side effects; 257 (48%) missed-dose instructions; and 245 (46%) interactions. Subsidy recipients and non-English speakers were significantly less likely to be counseled on drug name, indication, and side effects. The presence of certain health conditions was also associated with missing consultation elements. CONCLUSION: While Medicare beneficiaries are generally adherent to medication therapy, adherence barriers must be identified and addressed during comprehensive medication consultation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ppa.s64825

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]New England Healthcare Institute (NEHI) Improving Patient Medication Adherence: Key Issues and Challenges in the Daily Practice of Medicine Cambridge, MA New England Healthcare Institute 2013 Available from: http://www.nehi.net/writable/publication_files/file/improving_patient_medication_adherence_key_issues_and_challenges_in_the_daily_practice_of_medicine.pdf Accessed September 10, 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carr-Lopez, Shek, A., Lastimosa, J., Patel, R., Woelfel, J., Galal, S., & Gundersen, B.
Affiliations
University of the Pacific (US)
Corresponding author
Galal, Suzanne
Venue
Patient Preference and Adherence
Published
2014-09
Volume
8
Pages
1277
ISSN
1177-889X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989019559
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Preference and Adherence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
medication adherence, Medicare beneficiaries, medication therapy management, pharmacist counseling, drug-related problems, language barriers, subsidy recipients, chronic disease, health fairs, prescription drug benefits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review