Cited by 217Child Abuse and TraumaChild Abuse and Related TraumaChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Improving measurement of child abuse and neglect: A systematic review and analysis of national prevalence studies

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Child maltreatment through physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, and exposure to domestic violence, causes substantial adverse health, educational and behavioural consequences through the lifespan. The generation of reliable data on the prevalence and characteristics of child maltreatment in nationwide populations is essential to plan and evaluate public health interventions to reduce maltreatment. Measurement of child maltreatment must overcome numerous methodological challenges. Little is known to date about the extent, nature and methodological quality of these national studies. This study aimed to systematically review the most comprehensive national studies of the prevalence of child maltreatment, and critically appraise their methodologies to help inform the design of future studies. METHODS: Guided by PRISMA and following a published protocol, we searched 22 databases from inception to 31 May 2019 to identify nationwide studies of the prevalence of either all five or at least four forms of child maltreatment. We conducted a formal quality assessment and critical analysis of study design. RESULTS: This review identified 30 national prevalence studies of all five or at least four forms of child maltreatment, in 22 countries. While sound approaches are available for different settings, methodologies varied widely in nature and robustness. Some instruments are more reliable and obtain more detailed and useful information about the characteristics of the maltreatment, including its nature, frequency, and the relationship between the child and the person who inflicted the maltreatment. Almost all studies had limitations, especially in the level of detail captured about maltreatment, and the adequacy of constructs of maltreatment types. CONCLUSIONS: Countries must invest in rigorous national studies of the prevalence of child maltreatment. Studies should use a sound instrument containing appropriate maltreatment constructs, and obtain nuanced information about its nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0227884

Cites

112 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig 1 PRISMA flow diagram.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 113 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SR Dube, 2004, Assessing the reliability of retrospective reports, Child Abuse Negl, 28, 729

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mathews, B., Pacella, R., Dunne, M. P., Simunovic, M., & Marston, C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Mathews, Ben
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2020-01-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
e0227884
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004206645
Cited by
217
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child abuse, child neglect, prevalence estimation, methodological quality, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, domestic violence exposure, study design limitations
MeSH terms
Physical Abuse, Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review