The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data
Open accessAbstract
Microorganisms are ubiquitous in the biosphere, playing a crucial role in both biogeochemistry of the planet and human health. However, identifying these microorganisms and defining their function are challenging. Widely used approaches in comparative metagenomics, 16S amplicon sequencing and whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGS), have provided access to DNA sequencing analysis to identify microorganisms and evaluate diversity and abundance in various environments. However, advances in parallel high-throughput DNA sequencing in the past decade have introduced major hurdles, namely standardization of methods, data storage, reproducible interoperability of results, and data sharing. The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), established by the National Science Foundation, enables all researchers to address queries on a regional to continental scale around a variety of environmental challenges and provide high-quality, integrated, and standardized data from field sites across the U.S. As the amount of metagenomic data continues to grow, standardized procedures that allow results across projects to be assessed and compared is becoming increasingly important in the field of metagenomics. We demonstrate the feasibility of using publicly available NEON soil metagenomic sequencing datasets in combination with open access Metagenomics Rapid Annotation using the Subsystem Technology (MG-RAST) server to illustrate advantages of WGS compared to 16S amplicon sequencing. Four WGS and four 16S amplicon sequence datasets, from surface soil samples prepared by NEON investigators, were selected for comparison, using standardized protocols collected at the same locations in Colorado between April-July 2014. The dominant bacterial phyla detected across samples agreed between sequencing methodologies. However, WGS yielded greater microbial resolution, increased accuracy, and allowed identification of more genera of bacteria, archaea, viruses, and eukaryota, and putative functional genes that would have gone undetected using 16S amplicon sequencing. NEON open data will be useful for future studies characterizing and quantifying complex ecological processes associated with changing aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., & Glöckner, F. O. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219 · Cited by 33,055
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
O'Leary, N. A., Wright, M. W., Brister, J. R., Ciufo, S., Haddad, D., McVeigh, R., Rajput, B., Robbertse, B., Smith-White, B., Ako-Adjei, D., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · Cited by 6,357
Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments
Wood, D. E., & Salzberg, S. L. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 · Cited by 4,521
Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes
Segata, N., Waldron, L., Ballarini, A., Narasimhan, V., Jousson, O., & Huttenhower, C. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2066 · Cited by 1,776 · cited 2×
“, Rockville, MD, USA), Kraken2 [51,52], MetaPhlAn [53], and MetaMaps [54], are able to achieve bacterial identification to species, subspecies, and/or strain level using unassembled metagenomic shotgun [55–58] and long sequencing reads [54].”
BackgroundAnalysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing
Ranjan, R., Rani, A., Metwally, A., McGee, H. S., & Perkins, D. L. (2016) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.083 · Cited by 981
Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes
Dinsdale, E. A., Edwards, R. A., Hall, D., Angly, F., Breitbart, M., Brulc, J. M., Furlan, M., Desnues, C., Haynes, M., Li, L., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06810 · Cited by 980
The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes
Walter, J., & Ley, R. (2011) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102830 · Cited by 720
Evaluating the Information Content of Shallow Shotgun Metagenomics
Hillmann, B., Al-Ghalith, G. A., Shields-Cutler, R. R., Zhu, Q., Gohl, D. M., Beckman, K. B., Knight, R., & Knights, D. (2018) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00069-18 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Next-generation sequencing: insights to advance clinical investigations of the microbiome
Wensel, C. R., Pluznick, J. L., Salzberg, S. L., & Sears, C. L. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci154944 · Cited by 437
Xu, L., Dong, Z., Chiniquy, D., Pierroz, G., Deng, S., Gao, C., Diamond, S., Simmons, T., Wipf, H. M.-L., Caddell, D., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23553-7 · Cited by 282
Becker, A., Schmartz, G. P., Gröger, L., Grammes, N., Galata, V., Philippeit, H., Weiland, J., Ludwig, N., Meese, E., Tierling, S., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.02.07.21251098 · Cited by 102
Becker, A., Schmartz, G. P., Gröger, L., Grammes, N., Galata, V., Philippeit, H., Weiland, J., Ludwig, N., Meese, E., Tierling, S., et al. (2022) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.009 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Brumfield, K. D., Huq, A., Colwell, R. R., Olds, J. L., & Leddy, M. B.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-02-13
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e0228899
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005676248
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0228899
- The paper
- Brumfield, K. D., Huq, A., Colwell, R. R., Olds, J. L., & Leddy, M. B. (2020). Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.