Cited by 18Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effectiveness of a digital device providing real-time visualized tooth brushing instructions: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Shida, Haruka, Okabayashi, Satoe, Yoshioka, Masami, Takase, Naoko, Nishiura, Masahiro, Okazawa, Yui, Kiyohara, Kosuke, Konda, Manako +3 more·2020·PLoS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this trial was to investigate whether a digital device that provides real-time visualized brushing instructions would contribute to the removal of dental plaque over usual brushing instructions. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, parallel-group, stratified permuted block randomized control trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Eligibility criteria included people aged ≥ 18 years, and exclude people who met the following criteria: severely crowded teeth; using interdental cleaning implement; having external injury in the oral cavity, or stomatitis; having less than 20 teeth; using orthodontic apparatus; visited to a dental clinic; having the possibility of consulting a dental clinic; having a dental license; not owning a smartphone or tablet device; smoker; taken antibiotics; pregnant; an allergy to the staining fluid; and employee of Sunstar Inc. All participants received tooth brushing instructions using video materials and were randomly assigned to one of two groups for four weeks: (1) an intervention group who used the digital device, providing real-time visualized instructions by connection with a mobile application; and (2) a control group that used a digital device which only collected their brushing logs. The primary outcome was the change in 6-point method plaque control record (PCR) score of all teeth between baseline and week 4. The t-test was used to compare the two groups in accordance with intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: Among 118 enrolled individuals, 112 participants were eligible for our analyses. The mean of PCR score at week 4 was 45.05% in the intervention group and 49.65% in the control group, and the change of PCR score from baseline was -20.46% in the intervention group and -15.77% in the control group (p = 0.088, 95% confidence interval -0.70-10.07). CONCLUSIONS: A digital device providing real-time visualized brushing instructions may be effective for the removal of dental plaque.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0235194

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Araújo and colleagues found that use of Novel Floss Holder in conjunction with Text Message resulted in a significant reduction of bleeding on probing (BOP) compared to other groups.

    “The findings of the study conducted by Araújo and colleagues were consistent with those of our research. Their observations revealed that the use of Novel Floss Holder in conjunction with Text Message resulted in a significant reduction of bleeding on probing (BOP) compared to other groups.[28]”

    From The effect of text message-based health guidelines reinforcement on clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy: A randomized clinical trial (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Methods (Procedure; page unavailable) say participants were prohibited from using dental floss, contrary to the claimed floss-holder intervention. The Results (page unavailable) report plaque control record scores, not bleeding on probing; the primary between-group difference was not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shida, H., Okabayashi, S., Yoshioka, M., Takase, N., Nishiura, M., Okazawa, Y., Kiyohara, K., Konda, M., Nishioka, N., Kawamura, T., & Iwami, T.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Tokushima Bunri University (JP)
  • Sunstar (Japan) (JP)
  • Otsuma Women's University (JP)
Corresponding author
Okabayashi, Satoe
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
e0235194
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038039032
Cited by
18
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Sunstar Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
toothbrushing, dental plaque removal, mobile application, oral hygiene, plaque control record, smartphone-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Computer Systems, Dental Plaque, Dental Plaque Index, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Toothbrushing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review