Cited by 7Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDental Health and Care Utilization

Effectiveness of smart applications of oral hygiene instructions on periodontal health compared to oral information: A prospective study

Open access
Alasmari, Dhafer, Alkhalaf, Mazen Sulaiman, Alqahtani, Saeed Maeed, Alqhtani, Nasser Raqe, Alqahtani, Abdullah Saad, Gufran, Khalid, Alotaibi, Yasser Khaled·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Nowadays, smartphone applications are widely used in different areas of life, including medical science. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a smartphone application of oral hygiene instructions (OHI) on periodontal health compared to the traditional chairside OHI. All the participants (n = 39) were divided into two groups: control group and test group. Participants of the control group were given verbal OHI and participants of the test group were asked to use a smartphone application to upkeep their oral habits. The gingival index (GI) and Quigley–Hein Turesky modification index (QHTMI) were used for scoring the plaque accumulation at baseline and after one month of the periodontal treatment. A paired t-test and an independent t-test were performed to compare the mean of GI and QHTMI between intra-group and inter-group, respectively. The paired t-test showed significant differences in GI and QHTMI improvement after one month in both groups. Moreover, the independent t-test showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the test group showed a lower mean score in GI and QHTMI assessments compared to the control group. Smartphone applications in oral health applications did not exhibit any superiority in periodontal health over the traditional OHI method in the current study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph192214703

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gingival bleeding index was evaluated by probing the sulcus and calculating the index 30 seconds after probing, with all clinical measurements performed by a single assessor.

    “The gingival bleeding index was evaluated by probing the sulcus of the teeth and calculating the index 30 seconds after the probing procedure, with all clinical measurements performed by a single assessor to ensure uniformity and consistency.[25]”

    From The effect of text message-based health guidelines reinforcement on clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy: A randomized clinical trial (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion states that this study did not assess the bleeding index (BI), contrary to the claim that it measured BI by probing and scoring after 30 seconds. The Materials and Methods do support the separate point that one examiner assessed all patients, but describe measurements of the gingival index (GI) and plaque index instead. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alasmari, D., Alkhalaf, M. S., Alqahtani, S. M., Alqhtani, N. R., Alqahtani, A. S., Gufran, K., & Alotaibi, Y. K.
Affiliations
  • Qassim University (SA)
  • Consultant Periodontics, Dental Department Border Guard Center, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
  • Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA)
Corresponding author
Gufran, Khalid
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
19
Issue
22
Pages
14703
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308866278
Cited by
7
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
  • Qassim University
  • Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
mobile application, dental hygiene education, periodontal health, dental plaque, gingival index, oral health education, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Dental Care, Humans, Oral Health, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Index, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review