Cited by 15Cancer survivorship and careSexual function and dysfunction studiesMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Experiences of a web-based psycho-educational intervention targeting sexual dysfunction and fertility distress in young adults with cancer-a self-determination theory perspective

Open access
Micaux Obol, Claire, Lampic, Claudia, Wettergren, Lena, Ljungman, Lisa, Eriksson, Lars E.·2020·PLoS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sexual and reproductive health are significant aspects of quality of life. Healthcare often fails to provide adequate support for young cancer survivors in this area, hence the need to develop more effective interventions. The present study aimed to describe experiences of participating in a web-based psycho-educational intervention focusing on sexual dysfunction and fertility distress after cancer, and to explore these experiences within the theoretical frame of the basic psychological needs for competence, relatedness and autonomy according to self-determination theory. METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews with 24 women and 4 men, age 19-40, were abductively analyzed using the Framework approach for qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Participant experiences corresponded well with the three main deductive themes competence, relatedness and autonomy, divided into a total of nine subthemes illustrating varying degrees of basic need satisfaction with considerable nuance but not without ambiguity. While satisfaction of the need for competence could be linked to the amount of information in relation to participants' cognitive capacity, satisfaction of the need for relatedness seemed to be of special importance for these young adults with cancer experience. Invitation to the program meant a chance at alleviating loneliness and normalizing problems, symptoms and concerns. Participants' descriptions of perceived autonomy support were more challenging and ambiguous, because of the many contradictions in participants' responses to their variable situations. CONCLUSION: Basic psychological needs were confirmed as flexible positions along a continuum rather than discrete and mutually exclusive qualities. Understanding the variety of basic need satisfaction may enhance the design of future web-based interventions to be even more inclusive, tailorable and autonomy-supportive. Further research is warranted to determine the role of basic need satisfaction as a possible mediator for web-based psychoeducational interventions in cancer survivorship care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0236180

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC medical research methodology. 2013; 13: 117–. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. 24047204 PMC3848812 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Micaux Obol, C., Lampic, C., Wettergren, L., Ljungman, L., & Eriksson, L. E.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of London (GB)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2020-07-22
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
e0236180
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044284838
Cited by
15
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Cancerfonden (2016/615, CAN 2016/615)
  • Karolinska Institutet (3-780/2014)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2017-01530)
  • Barncancerfonden (TJ2014-0050)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2014-4689)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, young adult cancer, cancer survivors, self-determination theory, basic psychological needs, need for competence, need for relatedness, need for autonomy, autonomy support, sexual and reproductive health, survivorship care, participant experiences
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Psychological Distress, Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Female, Fertility, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Personal Autonomy, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review