Cited by 192Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Internet interventions for improving psychological well-being in psycho-oncology: Review and recommendations

Open access
Leykin, Yan, Thekdi, Seema M., Shumay, Dianne M., Muñoz, Ricardo F., Riba, Michelle, Dunn, Laura B.·2012·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Too few cancer patients and survivors receive evidence-based interventions for mental health symptoms. This review examines the potential for Internet interventions to help fill treatment gaps in psychosocial oncology and presents evidence regarding the likely utility of Internet interventions for cancer patients. METHODS: The authors examined available literature regarding Internet interventions tailored to cancer patients' mental health needs and reviewed elements of Internet interventions for mental health relevant to advancing psycho-oncology Internet intervention research. RESULTS: Few rigorous studies focusing on mental health of cancer patients have been conducted online. A growing body of evidence supports the efficacy, accessibility, and acceptability of mental health Internet interventions for a variety of general and medical patient populations. The authors present recommendations and guidelines to assist researchers in developing, testing, and disseminating Internet interventions for cancer patients and survivors, to manage and improve their mental health. Issues unique to Internet interventions-including intervention structure, customization, provider interaction, and privacy and confidentiality issues-are discussed. These guidelines are offered as a step toward establishing a set of "best practices" for Internet interventions in psycho-oncology and to generate further discussion regarding the goals of such interventions and their place in cancer care. CONCLUSIONS: Internet interventions have the potential to fill an important gap in quality cancer care by augmenting limited available mental health services. These interventions should be developed in a manner consistent with best practices and must be empirically tested and validated. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1993

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leykin, Y., Thekdi, S. M., Shumay, D. M., Muñoz, R. F., Riba, M., & Dunn, L. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Laura B.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
1016-1025
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1956290675
Cited by
192
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH091501, 1R34MH091231)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
online intervention, cancer patients, cancer survivors, psychological well-being, mental health, psycho-oncology, best practices, intervention design, privacy and confidentiality, treatment gap
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical Oncology, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Social Support, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review