Cited by 24Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMusic Therapy and HealthStudent Stress and Coping

Auricular stimulation vs. expressive writing for exam anxiety in medical students – A randomized crossover investigation

Open access
Usichenko, Taras, Wenzel, Anna, Klausenitz, Catharina, Petersmann, Astrid, Hesse, Thomas, Neumann, Nicola, Hahnenkamp, Klaus·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Auricular stimulation (AS) is a promising method in the treatment of situational anxiety. Expressive writing (EW) is an established psychological method, which reduces test anxiety and improves exam results. The aim of this crossover trial was to compare AS with EW, and with the no intervention (NI) condition, for treatment of exam anxiety. METHODS: Healthy medical students underwent 3 comparable anatomy exams with an interval of one month, either performing EW, receiving AS or NI prior to the exam; the order of interventions was randomized. AS was applied using indwelling fixed needles bilaterally at the areas innervated mostly by the auricular branch of the vagal nerve on the day before the exam. Anxiety level, measured using State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and after the interventions and immediately before exam, was the primary outcome. Quality of night sleep, blood pressure, heart rate and activity of salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) were analyzed across 3 conditions. RESULTS: All 37 included participants completed the study. Anxiety level (STAI) decreased immediately after AS in comparison with baseline (P = 0.02) and remained lower in comparison with that after EW and NI (P<0.01) on the day of exam. After EW and NI anxiety increased on the day of exam in comparison with baseline (P<0.01). Quality of sleep improved after AS in comparison with both control conditions (P<0.01). The activity of sAA decreased after EW and after AS (P<0.05) but not after NI condition. CONCLUSION: Auricular stimulation, but not expressive writing, reduced exam anxiety and improved quality of sleep in medical students. These changes might be due to reduced activity of the sympathetic nervous system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0238307

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expressive writing has been proven effective in patients with chronic diseases and cancer to reduce and manage psychophysical symptoms.

    “This technique has also been proven effective in patients with chronic diseases and cancer, to reduce and manage psychophysical symptoms [14,15].”

    From Effectiveness of Expressive Writing in Kidney Transplanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction reports that expressive writing reduced depressive symptoms in people taking stressful exams, but it does not report effectiveness in patients with chronic diseases or cancer. The Discussion says expressive writing had no effect on anxiety or exam performance in this trial of medical students. Our copy therefore supports a narrower claim about depressive symptoms in exam-takers, not the claimed patient groups or range of symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Spielberger CD. Manual for state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI: Form Y). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1983.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Usichenko, T., Wenzel, A., Klausenitz, C., Petersmann, A., Hesse, T., Neumann, N., & Hahnenkamp, K.
Affiliations
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
Corresponding author
Usichenko, Taras
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-08-27
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
e0238307
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082077916
Cited by
24
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
auricular stimulation, expressive writing, test anxiety, medical students, auricular acupuncture, vagus nerve, salivary amylase, sleep quality, sympathetic nervous system, anxiety reduction
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Adolescent, Adult, alpha-Amylases, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Students, Medical, Writing, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review