Cited by 30COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Characterisation of 22445 patients attending UK emergency departments with suspected COVID-19 infection: Observational cohort study

Open access
Goodacre, Steve, Thomas, Ben, Lee, Ellen, Sutton, Laura, Loban, Amanda, Waterhouse, Simon, Simmonds, Richard, Biggs, Katie +14 more·2020·PLOS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Hospital emergency departments play a crucial role in the initial assessment and management of suspected COVID-19 infection. This needs to be guided by studies of people presenting with suspected COVID-19, including those admitted and discharged, and those who do not ultimately have COVID-19 confirmed. We aimed to characterise patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19, including subgroups based on sex, ethnicity and COVID-19 test results. Methods and findings: We undertook a mixed prospective and retrospective observational cohort study in 70 emergency departments across the United Kingdom (UK). We collected presenting data from 22445 people attending with suspected COVID-19 between 26 March 2020 and 28 May 2020. Outcomes were admission to hospital, COVID-19 result, organ support (respiratory, cardiovascular or renal), and death, by record review at 30 days. Mean age was 58.4 years, 11200 (50.4%) were female and 11034 (49.6%) male. Adults (age >16 years) were acutely unwell (median NEWS2 score of 4), frequently had limited performance status (46.9%) and had high rates of admission (67.1%), COVID-19 positivity (31.2%), organ support (9.8%) and death (15.5%). Children had much lower rates of admission (27.4%), COVID-19 positivity (1.2%), organ support (1.4%) and death (0.3%). Similar numbers of men and women presented to the ED, but men were more likely to be admitted (72.9% v 61.4%), require organ support (12.2% v 7.7%) and die (18.2% v 13.0%). Black or Asian adults tended to be younger than White adults (median age 54, 50 and 67 years), were less likely to have impaired performance status (43.1%, 26.8% and 51.6%), be admitted to hospital (60.8%, 57.3%, 69.6%) or die (11.6%, 11.2%, 16.4%), but were more likely to require organ support (15.9%, 14.3%, 8.9%) or have a positive COVID-19 test (40.8%, 42.1%, 30.0%). Adults admitted with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 had similar age, performance status and comorbidities (except chronic lung disease) to those who did not have COVID-19 confirmed, but were much more likely to need organ support (22.2% v 8.9%) or die (32.1% v 15.5%). Conclusions: Important differences exist between patient groups presenting to the emergency department with suspected COVID-19. Adults and children differ markedly and require different approaches to emergency triage. Admission and adverse outcome rates among adults suggest that policies to avoid unnecessary ED attendance achieved their aim. Subsequent COVID-19 confirmation confers a worse prognosis and greater need for organ support. Registration: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN56149622, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN28342533 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0240206

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing suspected or confirmed pneumonia in adults in the community. Published: 3 April 2020. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng165 (accessed 28/04/2020) 33497157

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodacre, S., Thomas, B., Lee, E., Sutton, L., Loban, A., Waterhouse, S., Simmonds, R., Biggs, K., Marincowitz, C., Schutter, J., Connelly, S., Sheldon, E., Hall, J., Young, E., Bentley, A., Challen, K., Fitzsimmons, C., Harris, T., Lecky, F., Lee, A., Maconochie, I., & Walter, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Goodacre, Steve
  • Thomas, Ben
  • Lee, Ellen
  • Sutton, Laura
  • Loban, Amanda
  • Waterhouse, Simon
  • Simmonds, Richard
  • Biggs, Katie
  • Marincowitz, Carl
  • Connelly, Sarah
  • Sheldon, Elena
  • Hall, Jamie
  • Young, Emma
  • Bentley, Andrew
  • Challen, Kirsty
  • Fitzsimmons, Chris
  • Harris, Tim
  • Lecky, Fiona
  • Lee, Andrew
  • Maconochie, Ian
  • Walter, Darren
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-11-25
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
e0240206
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110518214
Cited by
30
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Health Technology Assessment Programme (11/46/07)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department presentation, suspected COVID-19, hospitalization, organ support, mortality, sex differences, ethnicity, children, performance status, NEWS2 score, SARS-CoV-2, United Kingdom, emergency department utilization, resource allocation, health disparities, pediatric emergency department, children's hospitals
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Triage, Comorbidity, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review