The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: A false-negative case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is defined as a person with suspected infection and an initial negative result by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, with a positive result on a subsequent test. False-negative cases have important implications for isolation and risk of transmission of infected people and for the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to review and critically appraise evidence about the rate of RT-PCR false-negatives at initial testing for COVID-19. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, as well as COVID-19 repositories, including the EPPI-Centre living systematic map of evidence about COVID-19 and the Coronavirus Open Access Project living evidence database. Two authors independently screened and selected studies according to the eligibility criteria and collected data from the included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. We calculated the proportion of false-negative test results using a multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression model. The certainty of the evidence about false-negative cases was rated using the GRADE approach for tests and strategies. All information in this article is current up to July 17, 2020. Results: We included 34 studies enrolling 12,057 COVID-19 confirmed cases. All studies were affected by several risks of bias and applicability concerns. The pooled estimate of false-negative proportion was highly affected by unexplained heterogeneity (tau-squared = 1.39; 90% prediction interval from 0.02 to 0.54). The certainty of the evidence was judged as very low due to the risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency issues. Conclusions: There is substantial and largely unexplained heterogeneity in the proportion of false-negative RT-PCR results. The collected evidence has several limitations, including risk of bias issues, high heterogeneity, and concerns about its applicability. Nonetheless, our findings reinforce the need for repeated testing in patients with suspicion of SARS-Cov-2 infection given that up to 54% of COVID-19 patients may have an initial false-negative RT-PCR (very low certainty of evidence). Systematic review registration: Protocol available on the OSF website: https://tinyurl.com/vvbgqya .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · Cited by 48,884
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M. G., Sterne, J. A. C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & the QUADAS-2 Group* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · Cited by 14,199
Self-citationRichardson, S., Hirsch, J. S., Narasimhan, M., Crawford, J. M., McGinn, T., Davidson, K. W., and the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium, Barnaby, D. P., Becker, L. B., Chelico, J. D., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6775 · Cited by 9,254
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
Corman, V. M., Landt, O., Kaiser, M., Molenkamp, R., Meijer, A., Chu, D. K., Bleicker, T., Brünink, S., Schneider, J., Schmidt, M. L., et al. (2020) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.3.2000045 · Cited by 7,344
Ai, T., Yang, Z., Hou, H., Zhan, C., Chen, C., Lv, W., Tao, Q., Sun, Z., & Xia, L. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200642 · Cited by 5,685
Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis
Verity, R., Okell, L. C., Dorigatti, I., Winskill, P., Whittaker, C., Imai, N., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., Thompson, H., Walker, P. G. T., Fu, H., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30243-7 · Cited by 3,660
Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR
Fang, Y., Zhang, H., Xie, J., Lin, M., Ying, L., Pang, P., & Ji, W. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200432 · Cited by 3,354
McInnes, M. D. F., Moher, D., Thombs, B. D., McGrath, T. A., Bossuyt, P. M., and the PRISMA-DTA Group, Clifford, T., Cohen, J. F., Deeks, J. J., Gatsonis, C., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.19163 · Cited by 3,210
Self-citationChest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to Duration of Infection
Bernheim, A., Mei, X., Huang, M., Yang, Y., Fayad, Z. A., Zhang, N., Diao, K., Lin, B., Zhu, X., Li, K., et al. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200463 · Cited by 2,655
Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019
Zhao, J., Yuan, Q., Wang, H., Liu, W., Liao, X., Su, Y., Wang, X., Yuan, J., Li, T., Li, J., et al. (2020) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa344 · Cited by 2,607
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- BE Young, 2020, Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore, JAMA
- DC Buitrago-Garcia, The role of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: rapid living systematic review and meta-analysis, medRxiv, 2020
- World Health Organization, 2020, Interim guidance
- Asociación Colombiana de Infectología, 2020, Consenso Colombiano de Atención, Diagnóstico y Manejo de la Infección por SARS-CoV-2/ COVID-19 en establecimientos de atención de la salud, Infectio, 24, 1
- National Institute for Communicable Diseases Department, 2020, Clinical Management of Suspected or confirmed COVID-19 Disease
- Pakistan Chest Society (PCS) Guidelines Working Group, 2020, Guidelines on Management of Patients with COVID-19
- LO Gostin, 2018, Public Health Emergency Preparedness: Globalizing Risk, Localizing Threats, JAMA, 320, 1743, 10.1001/jama.2018.16491 · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.16491
- C Fechner, 2020, COVID-19 and the role of imaging: early experiences in Central Switzerland, Swiss Med Wkly, 150, w20304, 10.4414/smw.2020.20304 · doi:10.4414/smw.2020.20304
- DR Long, 2020, Occurrence and Timing of Subsequent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Positivity Among Initially Negative Patients, Clin Infect Dis
- N Shen, 2020, Characteristics and diagnosis rate of 5630 subjects receiving SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests from Wuhan, China, JCI Insight, 5, 10.1172/jci.insight.137662 · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.137662
- X Xie, Chest CT for Typical 2019-nCoV Pneumonia: Relationship to Negative RT-PCR Testing, Radiology, 2020, 200343
- J Zhifeng, 2020, Consistency analysis of COVID-19 nucleic acid tests and the changes of lung CT, Journal of clinical virology: the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 127, 104359, 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104359 · doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104359
- J-L He, Diagnostic performance between CT and initial real-time RT-PCR for clinically suspected 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients outside Wuhan, China, Respiratory Medicine
Cited by
Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact
Davis, H. E., Assaf, G. S., McCorkell, L., Wei, H., Low, R. J., Re'em, Y., Redfield, S., Austin, J. P., & Akrami, A. (2021) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019 · Cited by 2,881
“This reinforces the need for early testing in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, given that up to 54% of patients could have an initial RTPCR false-negative result [41].”
BackgroundRapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J. J., Adriano, A., Berhane, S., Davenport, C., Dittrich, S., Emperador, D., Takwoingi, Y., Cunningham, J., Beese, S., et al. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013705 · Cited by 1,156
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J. J., Berhane, S., Taylor, M., Adriano, A., Davenport, C., Dittrich, S., Emperador, D., Takwoingi, Y., Cunningham, J., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013705.pub2 · Cited by 591
Tabacof, L., Tosto-Mancuso, J., Wood, J., Cortes, M., Kontorovich, A., McCarthy, D., Rizk, D., Rozanski, G., Breyman, E., Nasr, L., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000001910 · Cited by 459
False Negative Rate of COVID-19 PCR Testing: A Discordant Testing Analysis
Kanji, J. N., Zelyas, N., MacDonald, C., Pabbaraju, K., Khan, M. N., Prasad, A., Hu, J., Diggle, M., Berenger, B. M., & Tipples, G. (2021) · Virology Journal · doi:10.1186/s12985-021-01489-0 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Arevalo-Rodriguez, I., Buitrago-Garcia, D., Simancas-Racines, D., Zambrano-Achig, P., Del Campo, R., Ciapponi, A., Sued, O., Martinez-García, L., Rutjes, A. W., Low, N., Bossuyt, P. M., Perez-Molina, J. A., & Zamora, J.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-12-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e0242958
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111916089
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0242958
- The paper
- Arevalo-Rodriguez, I., Buitrago-Garcia, D., Simancas-Racines, D., Zambrano-Achig, P., Del Campo, R., Ciapponi, A., Sued, O., Martinez-García, L., Rutjes, A. W., Low, N., Bossuyt, P. M., Perez-Molina, J. A., & Zamora, J. (2020). False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
