Cited by 20Cancer survivorship and careLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment burden experienced by patients with lung cancer

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: Patients’ burden from lung cancer treatment is not well researched, but this understanding can facilitate a patient-centred treatment approach. Current models of treatment burden suggest it is influenced by a patient’s perception of their disease and treatment and their capacity to do the work required to treat their disease. Methods: Sixteen patients and 1 carer who were undergoing or had completed conventional or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy for lung cancer in the last 6 months participated in a semi-structured interview. A treatment burden framework was used with three main themes: a) treatment work, b) consequences of treatment and c) psychosocial factors affecting treatment burden. Results: The majority of patients did not feel unduly burdened by treatment tasks, despite having a large treatment-associated workload. Many saw treatment as a priority, causing them to restructure their life to accommodate for it. Patients wished that they would have been better informed about the lifestyle changes that they would have to make before treatment for lung cancer commenced and that the health service would provide services to assist them with this task. Discussion: While there was a large burden associated with lung cancer treatment, patients felt motivated and equipped to manage the workload because the disease was considered severe and life-threatening, and the treatment was seen as beneficial. Before initiating treatment for lung cancer, patients should be informed about lifestyle changes they likely have to make and should be offered assistance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0245492

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expensive follow-up treatment for esophageal cancer can place a heavy financial burden on families, leading to delays in seeking medical help or poor treatment adherence.

    “In the case of esophageal cancer as a chronic disease, expensive follow-up treatment can place a heavy fnancial burden on families, leading to delays in seeking medical help or poor treatment adherence [40,41].”

    From Symptom Experiences before Medical Help-Seeking and Psychosocial Responses of Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Qualitative Study. (2023) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results (Consequences of treatment; page unavailable) describe financial hardship for some lung-cancer patients whose treatment constrained their ability to work. The Introduction says treatment burden can cause non-adherence. The paper does not establish that expensive follow-up treatment for esophageal cancer burdens families or delays seeking medical help; participants said they did not have to pay for treatment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S Petri, 2015, Lived experiences of everyday life during curative radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A phenomenological study, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 10, 29397, 10.3402/qhw.v10.29397 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
El-Turk, N., Chou, M. S. H., Ting, N. C. H., Girgis, A., Vinod, S. K., Bray, V., & Dobler, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool Hospital (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
El-Turk, Nicole
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-01-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
e0245492
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125831186
Cited by
20
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Western Sydney Local Health District
  • Cancer Institute NSW
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1123733)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
lung cancer, treatment burden, patient experience, stereotactic body radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, psychosocial factors, lifestyle modification, patient-centered care, patient information, caregivers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emotions, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review