The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A performance comparison of supervised machine learning models for Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis
Open accessAbstract
The spread of Covid-19 has resulted in worldwide health concerns. Social media is increasingly used to share news and opinions about it. A realistic assessment of the situation is necessary to utilize resources optimally and appropriately. In this research, we perform Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis using a supervised machine learning approach. Identification of Covid-19 sentiments from tweets would allow informed decisions for better handling the current pandemic situation. The used dataset is extracted from Twitter using IDs as provided by the IEEE data port. Tweets are extracted by an in-house built crawler that uses the Tweepy library. The dataset is cleaned using the preprocessing techniques and sentiments are extracted using the TextBlob library. The contribution of this work is the performance evaluation of various machine learning classifiers using our proposed feature set. This set is formed by concatenating the bag-of-words and the term frequency-inverse document frequency. Tweets are classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Performance of classifiers is evaluated on the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. For completeness, further investigation is made on the dataset using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture of the deep learning model. The results show that Extra Trees Classifiers outperform all other models by achieving a 0.93 accuracy score using our proposed concatenated features set. The LSTM achieves low accuracy as compared to machine learning classifiers. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed feature set, the results are compared with the Vader sentiment analysis technique based on the GloVe feature extraction approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text
Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 · Cited by 6,087
Guo (2020) · doi:10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0 · Cited by 4,735
A survey of decision tree classifier methodology
Safavian, S. R., & Landgrebe, D. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.97458 · Cited by 3,808
The COVID-19 social media infodemic
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5 · Cited by 2,313
Deep learning for sentiment analysis: A survey
Zhang, L., Wang, S., & Liu, B. (2018) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1253 · Cited by 1,928
Economic Effects of Coronavirus Outbreak (COVID-19) on the World Economy
Fernandes, N. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3557504 · Cited by 1,881
Li, S., Wang, Y., Xue, J., Zhao, N., & Zhu, T. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17062032 · Cited by 1,835
Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: Infoveillance study
Abd-Alrazaq, A., Alhuwail, D., Househ, M., Hamdi, M., & Shah, Z. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19016 · Cited by 774
Cited by
COVID-19 Tweets Classification Based on a Hybrid Word Embedding Method
Didi, Y., Walha, A., & Wali, A. (2022) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc6020058 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Rustam, F., Khalid, M., Aslam, W., Rupapara, V., Mehmood, A., & Choi, G. S.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2021-02-25
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e0245909
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3131504710
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 23.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A performance comparison of supervised machine learning models for Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0245909
- The paper
- Rustam, F., Khalid, M., Aslam, W., Rupapara, V., Mehmood, A., & Choi, G. S. (2021). A performance comparison of supervised machine learning models for Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.