Cited by 15Mental Health Research TopicsSchizophrenia research and treatmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Early expressions of psychopathology and risk associated with trans-diagnostic transition to mood and psychotic disorders in adolescents and young adults

Open access
Scott, Jan, Crouse, Jacob J., Ho, Nicholas, Iorfino, Frank, Martin, Nicholas, Parker, Richard, McGrath, John, Gillespie, Nathan A. +2 more·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Objectives: The heterogeneity and comorbidity of major mental disorders presenting in adolescents and young adults has fostered calls for trans-diagnostic research. This study examines early expressions of psychopathology and risk and trans-diagnostic caseness in a community cohort of twins and non-twin siblings. Methods: Using data from the Brisbane Longitudinal Twin Study, we estimated median number of self-rated psychiatric symptoms, prevalence of subthreshold syndromes, family history of mood and/or psychotic disorders, and likelihood of subsequent trans-diagnostic caseness (individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for mood and/or psychotic syndromes). Next, we used cross-validated Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) analyses to identify the nature and relative importance of individual self-rated symptoms that predicted trans-diagnostic caseness. We examined the positive and negative predictive values (PPV; NPV) and accuracy of all classifications (Area under the Curve and 95% confidence intervals: AUC; 95% CI). Results: Of 1815 participants (Female 1050, 58%; mean age 26.40), more than one in four met caseness criteria for a mood and/or psychotic disorder. Examination of individual factors indicated that the AUC was highest for subthreshold syndromes, followed by family history then self-rated psychiatric symptoms, and that NPV always exceeded PPV for caseness. In contrast, the CHAID analysis (adjusted for age, sex, twin status) generated a classification tree comprising six trans-diagnostic symptoms. Whilst the contribution of two symptoms (need for sleep; physical activity) to the model was more difficult to interpret, CHAID analysis indicated that four self-rated symptoms (sadness; feeling overwhelmed; impaired concentration; paranoia) offered the best discrimination between cases and non-cases. These four symptoms showed different associations with family history status. Conclusions: The findings need replication in independent cohorts. However, the use of CHAID might provide a means of identifying specific subsets of trans-diagnostic symptoms representing clinical phenotypes that predict transition to caseness in individuals at risk of onset of major mental disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0252550

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, J., Crouse, J. J., Ho, N., Iorfino, F., Martin, N., Parker, R., McGrath, J., Gillespie, N. A., Medland, S., & Hickie, I. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Scott, Jan
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-06-04
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
e0252550
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164910755
Cited by
15
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1031119, 1049911, APP10499110)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Centre of Research Excellence (1061043)
  • National Institute of Health (K99R00, R00DA02354)
  • Australia Fellowship (511921)
  • John Cade Fellowship (APP1056929)
  • Niels Bohr Professorship, Danish National Research Foundation
  • NHRMC fellowships (APP1103623 and APP1172917)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
mood disorders, psychosis, adolescents and young adults, family history of mental illness, early risk prediction, paranoia, sadness, impaired concentration, physical activity, twins and siblings
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychotic Disorders, Twins, Mood Disorders, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review