Cited by 22Escherichia coli research studiesAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research

Colibactin possessing E. coli isolates in association with colorectal cancer and their genetic diversity among Pakistani population

Open access
Tariq, Habiba, Noreen, Zobia, Ahmad, Aftab, Khan, Laraib, Ali, Mashhood, Malik, Muhammad, Javed, Aneela, Rasheed, Faisal +4 more·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cause of tumorigenesis and several pathogenic bacteria have been correlated with aggressive cases of cancer i.e., genotoxin (colibactin) producing Escherichia coli ( E . coli) . This study was designed to investigate the genetic diversity of clb + clb + E . coli strains and their association with CRC. Pathogenic E . coli isolates from colorectal biopsies were characterized based on phylotypes, antibiotic resistance pattern, and (Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Sequence-based Polymerase Chain Reaction) ERIC-PCR. Furthermore, isolates were screened for the presence of the Pks (polyketide synthase) Island specifically targeting colibactin genes A and Q. The selective clb + clb + isolates were subjected to cytotoxicity assay using Human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell lines. We revealed that 43.47% of the cancer-associated E . coli isolates were from phylogroup B2 comparatively more pathogenic than rest while in the case of healthy controls no isolate was found from B2. Moreover, 90% were found positive for colibactin and pks (polyketide synthase) island, while none of the healthy controls were found positive for colibactin genes. All healthy and cancer-associated isolates were tested against 15 antibiotic agents, we observed that cancer-associated isolates showed a wide range of resistance from 96% against Nalidixic acid to 48% against Doxycycline. Moreover, E . coli isolates were further genotyped using ERIC-PCR, and selected clb + clb + E . coli isolates were subjected to cytotoxicity assay. We recorded the significant cytotoxic activity of clb+clb+ E . coli phylogroup B2 isolates that might have contributed towards the progression of CRC or dysbiosis of healthy gut microbiota protecting against CRC pathogenesis. Our results revealed a significant p <0.023 association of dietary habits and hygiene p <0.001with CRC. This is the first study to report the prevalence of E . coli phylogroups and the role of colibactin most virulent phylogroup B2 among Pakistani individuals from low socioeconomic setup.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0262662

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The B2 phylotype is likely the colibactin-positive most virulent phylogroup among E. coli.

    “the B2 phylotype is likely the colibactin-positive most virulent phylogroup among E. coli [145].”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [145]

    The Abstract describes B2 isolates from colorectal cancer patients as comparatively more pathogenic than the rest. The Results and discussion section on colibactin genes reports that all B2 isolates from those patients tested positive, while the other cancer-associated isolates did not. These findings support the claim for the studied isolates, but do not establish B2 as the most virulent phylogroup among E. coli generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tariq, H., Noreen, Z., Ahmad, A., Khan, L., Ali, M., Malik, M., Javed, A., Rasheed, F., Fatima, A., Kocagoz, T., Sezerman, U., & Bokhari, H.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK)
  • National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
  • Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
Corresponding author
Bokhari, Habib
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-11-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
e0262662
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308791422
Cited by
22
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
PROJECT NO.PSF-TUBITAK/C-COMSATS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Keywords
colibactin, Escherichia coli, colorectal cancer, phylogroup B2, antibiotic resistance, ERIC-PCR genotyping, cytotoxicity, gut dysbiosis, dietary habits, hygiene, Pakistani population
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Infections, Humans, Pakistan, Peptides, Genetic Variation, Colorectal Neoplasms, Polyketide Synthases, Polyketides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review