Cited by 20Smoking Behavior and CessationPharmacy and Medical PracticesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

A community pharmacist-led smoking cessation intervention using a smartphone app (PharmQuit): a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Asayut, Narong, Olson, Phayom Sookaneknun, Kanjanasilp, Juntip, Thanarat, Preut, Senkraigul, Bhattaraporn, Sittisarn, Chuthathip, Suksawat, Suratsawatee·2022·PLoS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

WHO supports the harnessing of mobile technologies to improve access to smoking cessation services. As such, this study evaluated the effectiveness of smoking cessation services provided by community pharmacists using PharmQuit compared with standard care. The study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that included 156 participants who were 18 years or older and smoked at least one cigarette daily for a month, were ready to quit, willing to participate, and had a smartphone. The study was performed at seven community pharmacies in three provinces in Thailand. Participants were allocated to the intervention (n = 78) and control groups (n = 78). Both groups received the usual smoking cessation services with pharmacotherapy and counseling from community pharmacists for 6 months. The intervention group received PharmQuit as an additional service. Both groups were scheduled for follow-up visits on days 7, 14, 30, 60, 120, and 180. The primary outcome was continuous abstinence rate on day 180. The secondary outcomes included 7-day point abstinence rate, number of cigarettes smoked per day, exhaled carbon monoxide levels, adherence rate to the program, and satisfaction with PharmQuit. An analysis using the intent-to-treat principle was performed. Smoking cessation rates and the number of cigarettes smoked per day were significantly higher during the follow-up visits in both groups (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The adherence rate to the smoking cessation program was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (74 days vs. 60 days, p > 0.05). The results showed the benefits of the contribution of community pharmacists. Although the inclusion of PharmQuit did not yield better results than pharmacists' counselling alone, it may help obtain better adherence to smoking cessation programs. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20200925004 on September 25, 2020 -retrospectively registered, http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&smenu=fulltext&task=search&task2=view1&id=6841.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0265483

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Sookaneknun S, Sookaneknun P, Seesin T, Bunditanukul K, Phianchana P, Sirithanawuthichai T, et al. Outcomes of a two-year smoke-free university and organizational policy management. MJPHM. 2018; 18(2): 109– 122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asayut, N., Olson, P. S., Kanjanasilp, J., Thanarat, P., Senkraigul, B., Sittisarn, C., & Suksawat, S.
Affiliations
Mahasarakham University (TH)
Corresponding author
Olson, Phayom Sookaneknun
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2022-03-29
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
e0265483
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226139456
Cited by
20
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Health Security Office region 7 Khon Kaen
  • Thai Health Promotion Foundation
  • Smoke Free Pharmacy Network
  • Community Pharmacy Foundation
  • Faculty of Pharmacy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking cessation, community pharmacists, pharmacist counseling, mobile application, mobile health, nicotine replacement therapy, abstinence rates, program adherence, exhaled carbon monoxide, Thailand
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Pharmacists, Prospective Studies, Smoking Cessation, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review