Cited by 90Medical Imaging and AnalysisScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI

Using deep transfer learning to detect scoliosis and spondylolisthesis from x-ray images

Open access
Fraiwan, Mohammad, Audat, Ziad, Fraiwan, Luay, Manasreh, Tarek·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed wider prevalence of vertebral column pathologies due to lifestyle changes, sedentary behaviors, or injuries. Spondylolisthesis and scoliosis are two of the most common ailments with an incidence of 5% and 3% in the United States population, respectively. Both of these abnormalities can affect children at a young age and, if left untreated, can progress into severe pain. Moreover, severe scoliosis can even lead to lung and heart problems. Thus, early diagnosis can make it easier to apply remedies/interventions and prevent further disease progression. Current diagnosis methods are based on visual inspection by physicians of radiographs and/or calculation of certain angles (e.g., Cobb angle). Traditional artificial intelligence-based diagnosis systems utilized these parameters to perform automated classification, which enabled fast and easy diagnosis supporting tools. However, they still require the specialists to perform error-prone tedious measurements. To this end, automated measurement tools were proposed based on processing techniques of X-ray images. In this paper, we utilize advances in deep transfer learning to diagnose spondylolisthesis and scoliosis from X-ray images without the need for any measurements. We collected raw data from real X-ray images of 338 subjects (i.e., 188 scoliosis, 79 spondylolisthesis, and 71 healthy). Deep transfer learning models were developed to perform three-class classification as well as pair-wise binary classifications among the three classes. The highest mean accuracy and maximum accuracy for three-class classification was 96.73% and 98.02%, respectively. Regarding pair-wise binary classification, high accuracy values were achieved for most of the models (i.e., > 98%). These results and other performance metrics reflect a robust ability to diagnose the subjects’ vertebral column disorders from standard X-ray images. The current study provides a supporting tool that can reasonably help the physicians make the correct early diagnosis with less effort and errors, and reduce the need for surgical interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0267851

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. MIT Press; 2016.
  2. [45]Tan M, Le Q. EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks. In: Chaudhuri K, Salakhutdinov R, editors. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. vol. 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR; 2019. p. 6105–6114. Available from: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/tan19a.html.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraiwan, M., Audat, Z., Fraiwan, L., & Manasreh, T.
Affiliations
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Corresponding author
Fraiwan, Mohammad
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-05-02
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
e0267851
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225270188
Cited by
90
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Keywords
scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, X-ray image classification, deep transfer learning, automated diagnosis, Cobb angle, spinal deformity detection
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Child, Humans, Scoliosis, Spondylolisthesis, X-Rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review