Cited by 21Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Text mining in long-term care: exploring the usefulness of artificial intelligence in a nursing home setting

Open access
Hacking, Coen, Verbeek, Hilde, Hamers, Jan P. H., Sion, Katya, Aarts, Sil·2022·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In nursing homes, narrative data are collected to evaluate quality of care as perceived by residents or their family members. This results in a large amount of textual data. However, as the volume of data increases, it becomes beyond the capability of humans to analyze it. This study aims to explore the usefulness of text mining approaches regarding narrative data gathered in a nursing home setting. DESIGN: Exploratory study showing a variety of text mining approaches. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data has been collected as part of the project 'Connecting Conversations': assessing experienced quality of care by conducting individual interviews with residents of nursing homes (n = 39), family members (n = 37) and care professionals (n = 49). METHODS: Several pre-processing steps were applied. A variety of text mining analyses were conducted: individual word frequencies, bigram frequencies, a correlation analysis and a sentiment analysis. A survey was conducted to establish a sentiment analysis model tailored to text collected in long-term care for older adults. RESULTS: Residents, family members and care professionals uttered respectively 285, 362 and 549 words per interview. Word frequency analysis showed that words that occurred most frequently in the interviews are often positive. Despite some differences in word usage, correlation analysis displayed that similar words are used by all three groups to describe quality of care. Most interviews displayed a neutral sentiment. Care professionals expressed a more diverse sentiment compared to residents and family members. A topic clustering analysis showed a total of 12 topics including 'relations' and 'care environment'. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the usefulness of text mining to extend our knowledge regarding quality of care in a nursing home setting. With the rise of textual (narrative) data, text mining can lead to valuable new insights for long-term care for older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0268281

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Jonker A, Ruijt C de, Gruijl J de. Bag & tag’em-a new dutch stemmer. Proceedings of the 12th language resources and evaluation conference. ELRA; 2020. pp. 3868– 3876.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hacking, C., Verbeek, H., Hamers, J. P. H., Sion, K., & Aarts, S.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Hacking, Coen
  • Verbeek, Hilde
  • Hamers, Jan P. H.
  • Sion, Katya
  • Aarts, Sil
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2022-08-25
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
e0268281
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293092947
Cited by
19
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
text mining, nursing homes, long-term care, quality of care, older adults, narrative data, sentiment analysis, word frequency analysis, bigram analysis, topic clustering, residents, family members, care professionals, artificial intelligence
MeSH terms
Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Family, Humans, Long-Term Care, Nursing Homes, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review