The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of telerehabilitation based on real-time intervention between therapist and participants for improving physical function, activities of daily living and quality of life in people with stroke: A systematic review protocol
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is a call for gathering more evidence on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in stroke. In particular, a previous systematic review reported substantial variability in the types of technologies used in telerehabilitation interventions. The purpose of this study will be to summarize and synthesize findings on the effects of telerehabilitation based on real-time intervention between therapist and participants for patients with stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. This systematic review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 25 May 2023 (registration number: CRD420234265527). Electronic searches will be performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and CINAHL electronic databases, using a date range from inception to November 2023. We will include only randomized controlled trials for patients diagnosed with stroke who received telerehabilitation based on real-time interaction between therapist and patients. The exploration will be restricted to publications in the English language. Physical function, activities of daily living and quality of life are the outcomes. We will examine the changes of the outcomes at baseline, at the end of the intervention, and at specific time points during the follow-up after the intervention. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide evidence regarding telerehabilitation for people with stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent neurorehabilitation studies demonstrate that ecologically embedded interventions within patients' social and vocational environments optimize quality of life by strengthening community integration.
“Recent neurorehabilitation studies31,32 corroborate this premise, demonstrating that ecologically embedded interventions within patients’ social and vocational environments optimize quality of life by strengthening community integration.”
From ORLA combined with telerehabilitation in patients with subacute Poststroke aphasia: a randomized controlled trial (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The Methods (Eligibility criteria; page not provided) describe a planned review of home-based telerehabilitation and list quality of life as an outcome. The copy does not report findings that interventions embedded in social or vocational environments improve quality of life through community integration; searches for those concepts found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · cited 1×
“The review methodology will follow the guidelines established by the Pre-ferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) [15, 16].”
MethodThe PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 · Cited by 13,874
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & the PRISMA-P Group (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647 · Cited by 13,120
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177
Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713 · Cited by 4,808
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60325-5 · Cited by 2,726
Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes
Shay, L. A., & Lafata, J. E. (2015) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14551638 · Cited by 1,214
Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The copenhagen stroke study
Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80038-7 · Cited by 1,165
Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
Olivo, S. A., Macedo, L. G., Gadotti, I. C., Fuentes, J., Stanton, T., & Magee, D. J. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070147 · Cited by 829
Comprehensive Overview of Nursing and Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Care of the Stroke Patient
Miller, E., Murray, L., Richards, L. G., Zorowitz, R. D., Bakas, T., Clark, P. C., & Billinger, S. A. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e3181e7512b · Cited by 791
Telerehabilitation services for stroke.
Laver, K. E., Schoene, D., Crotty, M., George, S., Lannin, N., & Sherrington, C. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010255.pub2 · Cited by 719
Telerehabilitation services for stroke
Laver, K., Adey‐Wakeling, Z., Crotty, M., Lannin, N. A., George, S., & Sherrington, C. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010255.pub3 · Cited by 614
Tele-Rehabilitation after Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature
Sarfo, F. S., Ulasavets, U., Opare‐Sem, O., & Ovbiagele, B. I. (2018) · Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013 · Cited by 389
Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review
Johansson, T., & Wild, C. (2011) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2010.100105 · Cited by 291
Telerehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tchero, H., Tabué-Teguo, M., Lannuzel, A., & Rüsch, E. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10867 · Cited by 278
Effects of Telerehabilitation on Physical Function and Disability for Stroke Patients
Chumbler, N. R., Quigley, P. A., Li, X., Morey, M. C., Rose, D. K., Sanford, J. A., Griffiths, P. C., & Hoenig, H. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.646943 · Cited by 177
Chen, J., Jin, W., Dong, W. S., Jin, Y., Qiao, F. L., Zhou, Y. F., & Ren, C. C. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000559 · Cited by 152
A Blueprint for Telerehabilitation Guidelines—October 2010
Brennan, D., Tindall, L. R., Theodoros, D., Brown, J., Campbell, M. J., Christiana, D., Smith, D., Cason, J., & Lee, A. (2011) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0036 · Cited by 89
Langan, J., DeLave, K., Phillips, L., Pangilinan, P. H., & Brown, S. H. (2013) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-1115 · Cited by 81
Wan, L., Zhang, X., Mo, M., Xiong, X., Ou, C., You, L., Chen, S., & Zhang, M. (2016) · Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.05.010 · Cited by 76
Telerehabilitation services for stroke
Laver, K., Schoene, D., Crotty, M., George, S., Lannin, N. A., & Sherrington, C. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010255 · Cited by 68
Redzuan, N. S., Engkasan, J. P., Mazlan, M., & Abdullah, S. J. B. F. (2012) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.025 · Cited by 58
Rintala, A., Päivärinne, V., Hakala, S., Paltamaa, J., Heinonen, A. O., Karvanen, J., & Sjögren, T. (2018) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.007 · Cited by 48
Kalra, L. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118451786.ch12 · Cited by 30
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kotlęga, D., Kobus-Kotlega, K., & Szczuko, M. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13233011 · Cited by 9
Gan, L., Huang, L., Li, L., Yang, X., Meng, L., Pang, Z., & Wei, Q. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06258-5 · Cited by 3
“The dual advantages of the TR paradigm—mitigating temporal and economic burdens while fostering psychosocial well-being 32 — may synergistically potentiate language recovery through engagement-mediated neuroplasticity mechanisms.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Fujii, R., Miki, T., Nonaka, Y., & Tanaka, S.
- Corresponding author
- Fujii, Ren
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2024-04-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0297649
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10986948
- OpenAlex
- W4393714702
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- telerehabilitation, stroke, therapeutic relationship, physical function, activities of daily living, quality of life, telemedicine
- MeSH terms
- Telerehabilitation, Stroke Rehabilitation, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Quality of Life, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
