Cited by 11Reproductive Health and TechnologiesGender, Health, and Social InequalityReproductive Health and Contraception

Intersectional analysis of the experiences of women who fail to conceive in low and middle income neighbourhoods of Delhi, India: Findings from a qualitative study

Open access
Adhikary, Priyanka, Mburu, Gitau, Kabra, Rita, Habib, Ndema Abu, Kiarie, James, Dhabhai, Neeta, Chowdhury, Ranadip, Mazumder, Sarmila·2024·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experiences of delayed conception and infertility have been reported among women. However, the concept of intersectionality is rarely utilised in studies of infertility, and it is particularly uncommon in research from low- and middle- income countries. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the lived experiences of women with delayed conception in low to -middle income neighbourhoods of Delhi, India? METHODS: This was a qualitative study (n = 35) that recruited women who had failed to conceive after 18 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. Data were collected between February and July 2021. Data were collected through focus group discussions in low income to middle income neighbourhoods of Delhi, India. Analysis identified themes related to intersecting axes of inequality. RESULTS: The results showed that gender intersected with economics, masculinity, patriarchal norms and class to influence the experiences of women. The intersection of gender, economics and patriarchal norms compromised women's agency to be active generators of family income, and this dynamic was exacerbated by patrilocal residence. In addition, masculinity contributed to stigmatisation and blaming of women, due to the inaccurate perception that men did not contribute to a couple's infertility. The intersection of gender and social class in medical settings created barriers to women's access to medical information. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study provide representative examples of the variety of axes of inequality that shape women's experiences in the study setting. Although these findings may not be generalisable to all women who are experiencing delayed conception, they highlight a need for improved awareness and education on infertility, as well as a need to ensure the availability and accessibility of fertility care for couples in need.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0304029

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Uberoi P. Family, kinship and marriage in India: Oxford University Press, USA; 1994.
  2. [36]Jain D. Indian women. New Delhi: Ministry of Information, Government of India Press; 1975.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adhikary, P., Mburu, G., Kabra, R., Habib, N. A., Kiarie, J., Dhabhai, N., Chowdhury, R., & Mazumder, S.
Affiliations
  • Society for Applied Studies (IN)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Mazumder, Sarmila
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2024-07-03
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
e0304029
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400278466
Cited by
11
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
World Health Organization (2020/1026382-0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
infertility, delayed conception, intersectionality, women's experiences, gender inequality, patriarchy, masculinity, social class, patrilocal residence, access to fertility care, low- and middle-income countries, Delhi
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fertilization, Humans, Income, India, Male, Poverty, Residence Characteristics, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Masculinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review