Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 509

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of Reemerging Chikungunya Virus

Open access
Sourisseau, Marion, Schilte, Clémentine, Casartelli, Nicoletta, Trouillet, Céline, Guivel-Benhassine, Florence, Rudnicka, Dominika, Sol-Foulon, Nathalie, Roux, Karin Le, Prevost, Marie-Christine, Fsihi, Hafida, Frenkiel, Marie-Pascale, Blanchet, Fabien, Afonso, Philippe V, Ceccaldi, Pierre-Emmanuel, Ozden, Simona, Gessain, Antoine, Schuffenecker, Isabelle, Verhasselt, Bruno, Zamborlini, Alessia, Saïb, Ali, Rey, Felix A, Arenzana-Seisdedos, Fernando, Desprès, Philippe, Michault, Alain, Albert, Matthew L, Schwartz, Olivier·2007·PLoS Pathogens

Abstract

An unprecedented epidemic of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection recently started in countries of the Indian Ocean area, causing an acute and painful syndrome with strong fever, asthenia, skin rash, polyarthritis, and lethal cases of encephalitis. The basis for chikungunya disease and the tropism of CHIKV remain unknown. Here, we describe the replication characteristics of recent clinical CHIKV strains. Human epithelial and endothelial cells, primary fibroblasts and, to a lesser extent, monocyte-derived macrophages, were susceptible to infection and allowed viral production. In contrast, CHIKV did not replicate in lymphoid and monocytoid cell lines, primary lymphocytes and monocytes, or monocyte-derived dendritic cells. CHIKV replication was cytopathic and associated with an induction of apoptosis in infected cells. Chloroquine, bafilomycin-A1, and short hairpin RNAs against dynamin-2 inhibited viral production, indicating that viral entry occurs through pH-dependent endocytosis. CHIKV was highly sensitive to the antiviral activity of type I and II interferons. These results provide a general insight into the interaction between CHIKV and its mammalian host.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030089

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 509

Metadata

Authors
Sourisseau, M., Schilte, C., Casartelli, N., Trouillet, C., Guivel-Benhassine, F., Rudnicka, D., Sol-Foulon, N., Roux, K. L., Prevost, M.-C., Fsihi, H., Frenkiel, M.-P., Blanchet, F., Afonso, P. V., Ceccaldi, P.-E., Ozden, S., Gessain, A., Schuffenecker, I., Verhasselt, B., Zamborlini, A., Saïb, A., Rey, F. A., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., Desprès, P., Michault, A., Albert, M. L., & Schwartz, O.
Venue
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2007-06-29
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
e89
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W2028357619
Cited by
509
References
0
FWCI
17.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Reemerging Chikungunya Virus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030089
The paper
Sourisseau, M., Schilte, C., Casartelli, N., Trouillet, C., Guivel-Benhassine, F., Rudnicka, D., Sol-Foulon, N., Roux, K. L., Prevost, M.-C., Fsihi, H., Frenkiel, M.-P., Blanchet, F., Afonso, P. V., Ceccaldi, P.-E., Ozden, S., Gessain, A., Schuffenecker, I., Verhasselt, B., Zamborlini, A., . . . Schwartz, O. (2007). Characterization of Reemerging Chikungunya Virus. PLoS Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030089

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.