The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wolbachia-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Is Associated with Impaired Histone Deposition in the Male Pronucleus
Open accessAbstract
Wolbachia is a bacteria endosymbiont that rapidly infects insect populations through a mechanism known as cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). In CI, crosses between Wolbachia-infected males and uninfected females produce severe cell cycle defects in the male pronucleus resulting in early embryonic lethality. In contrast, viable progeny are produced when both parents are infected (the Rescue cross). An important consequence of CI-Rescue is that infected females have a selective advantage over uninfected females facilitating the rapid spread of Wolbachia through insect populations. CI disrupts a number of prophase and metaphase events in the male pronucleus, including Cdk1 activation, chromosome condensation, and segregation. Here, we demonstrate that CI disrupts earlier interphase cell cycle events. Specifically, CI delays the H3.3 and H4 deposition that occurs immediately after protamine removal from the male pronucleus. In addition, we find prolonged retention of the replication factor PCNA in the male pronucleus into metaphase, indicating progression into mitosis with incompletely replicated DNA. We propose that these CI-induced interphase defects in de novo nucleosome assembly and replication are the cause of the observed mitotic condensation and segregation defects. In addition, these interphase chromosome defects likely activate S-phase checkpoints, accounting for the previously described delays in Cdk1 activation. These results have important implications for the mechanism of Rescue and other Wolbachia-induced phenotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork
Moldovan, G.-L., Pfander, B., & Jentsch, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.003 · Cited by 1,796 · cited 1×
“well as replicating DNA (for a review see [25]).”
BackgroundRegulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle
Branzei, D., & Foiani, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2351 · Cited by 1,228
Cited by
Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito‐borne disease
Iturbe‐Ormaetxe, I., Walker, T., & O' Neill, S. L. (2011) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2011.84 · Cited by 419
Wolbachia: more than just a bug in insects genitals
Saridaki, A., & Bourtzis, K. (2010) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.005 · Cited by 277
Caragata, E. P., Pais, F. S., Baton, L. A., Silva, J. B. L., Sorgine, M. H. F., & Moreira, L. A. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3441-4 · Cited by 55
Sicard, M., Bouchon, D., Ceyrac, L., Raimond, R., Thierry, M., Le Clec’h, W., Marcadé, I., Caubet, Y., & Grève, P. (2014) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2014.06.007 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Landmann, F., Orsi, G. A., Loppin, B., & Sullivan, W.
- Venue
- PLoS Pathogens
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-03-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1000343
- ISSN
- 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7374
- OpenAlex
- W2002987521
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wolbachia-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Is Associated with Impaired Histone Deposition in the Male Pronucleus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000343
- The paper
- Landmann, F., Orsi, G. A., Loppin, B., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Wolbachia-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Is Associated with Impaired Histone Deposition in the Male Pronucleus. PLoS Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.