The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amplicon Melting Analysis with Labeled Primers: A Closed-Tube Method for Differentiating Homozygotes and Heterozygotes
Abstract
Background: Common methods for identification of DNA sequence variants use gel electrophoresis or column separation after PCR. Methods: We developed a method for sequence variant analysis requiring only PCR and amplicon melting analysis. One of the PCR primers was fluorescently labeled. After PCR, the melting transition of the amplicon was monitored by high-resolution melting analysis. Different homozygotes were distinguished by amplicon melting temperature (Tm). Heterozygotes were identified by low-temperature melting of heteroduplexes, which broadened the overall melting transition. In both cases, melting analysis required ∼1 min and no sample processing was needed after PCR. Results: Polymorphisms in the HTR2A (T102C), β-globin [hemoglobin (Hb) S, C, and E], and cystic fibrosis (F508del, F508C, I507del, I506V) genes were analyzed. Heteroduplexes produced by amplification of heterozygous DNA were best detected by rapid cooling (>2 °C/s) of denatured products, followed by rapid heating during melting analysis (0.2–0.4 °C/s). Heterozygotes were distinguished from homozygotes by a broader melting transition, and each heterozygote had a uniquely shaped fluorescent melting curve. All homozygotes tested were distinguished from each other, including Hb AA and Hb SS, which differed in Tm by <0.2 °C. The amplicons varied in length from 44 to 304 bp. In place of one labeled and one unlabeled primer, a generic fluorescent oligonucleotide could be used if a 5′ tail of identical sequence was added to one of the two unlabeled primers. Conclusion: High-resolution melting analysis of PCR products amplified with labeled primers can identify both heterozygous and homozygous sequence variants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-Resolution Genotyping by Amplicon Melting Analysis Using LCGreen
Wittwer, C. T., Reed, G. H., Gundry, C. N., Vandersteen, J. G., & Pryor, R. J. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.6.853 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationHigh-Resolution DNA Melting Analysis for Simple and Efficient Molecular Diagnostics
Reed, G. H., Kent, J. O., & Wittwer, C. T. (2007) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.8.6.597 · Cited by 678
Self-citationMass spectral determination of fasting tear glucose concentrations in nondiabetic volunteers
Baca, J. T., Taormina, C. R., Feingold, E., Finegold, D. N., Grabowski, J. J., & Asher, S. A. (2007) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.078543 · Cited by 110
KRAS in NSCLC: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Cascetta, P., Marinello, A., Lazzari, C., Gregorc, V., Planchard, D., Bianco, R., Normanno, N., & Morabito, A. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14215430 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Gundry, C. N., Vandersteen, J. G., Reed, G. H., Pryor, R. J., Chen, J., & Wittwer, C. T.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 396-406
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2143198315
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amplicon Melting Analysis with Labeled Primers: A Closed-Tube Method for Differentiating Homozygotes and Heterozygotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/49.3.396
- The paper
- Gundry, C. N., Vandersteen, J. G., Reed, G. H., Pryor, R. J., Chen, J., & Wittwer, C. T. (2003). Amplicon Melting Analysis with Labeled Primers: A Closed-Tube Method for Differentiating Homozygotes and Heterozygotes. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.3.396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.