Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 660

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms by High-Resolution Melting of Small Amplicons

Liew, Michael, Pryor, Robert, Palais, Robert, Meadows, Cindy, Erali, Maria, Lyon, Elaine, Wittwer, Carl·2004·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: High-resolution melting of PCR amplicons with the DNA dye LCGreen™ I was recently introduced as a homogeneous, closed-tube method of genotyping that does not require probes or real-time PCR. We adapted this system to genotype single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) after rapid-cycle PCR (12 min) of small amplicons (≤50 bp). Methods: Engineered plasmids were used to study all possible SNP base changes. In addition, clinical protocols for factor V (Leiden) 1691G>A, prothrombin 20210G>A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 1298A>C, hemochromatosis (HFE) 187C>G, and β-globin (hemoglobin S) 17A>T were developed. LCGreen I was included in the reaction mixture before PCR, and high-resolution melting was obtained within 2 min after amplification. Results: In all cases, heterozygotes were easily identified because heteroduplexes altered the shape of the melting curves. Approximately 84% of human SNPs involve a base exchange between A::T and G::C base pairs, and the homozygotes are easily genotyped by melting temperatures (Tms) that differ by 0.8–1.4 °C. However, in ∼16% of SNPs, the bases only switch strands and preserve the base pair, producing very small Tm differences between homozygotes (<0.4 °C). Although most of these cases can be genotyped by Tm, one-fourth (4% of total SNPs) show nearest-neighbor symmetry, and, as predicted, the homozygotes cannot be resolved from each other. In these cases, adding 15% of a known homozygous genotype to unknown samples allows melting curve separation of all three genotypes. This approach was used for the HFE 187C>G protocol, but, as predicted from the sequence changes, was not needed for the other four clinical protocols. Conclusions: SNP genotyping by high-resolution melting analysis is simple, rapid, and inexpensive, requiring only PCR, a DNA dye, and melting instrumentation. The method is closed-tube, performed without probes or real-time PCR, and can be completed in less than 2 min after completion of PCR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2004.032136

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 660

Metadata

Authors
Liew, M., Pryor, R., Palais, R., Meadows, C., Erali, M., Lyon, E., & Wittwer, C.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
1156-1164
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2108508548
Cited by
660
References
3
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms by High-Resolution Melting of Small Amplicons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2004.032136
The paper
Liew, M., Pryor, R., Palais, R., Meadows, C., Erali, M., Lyon, E., & Wittwer, C. (2004). Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms by High-Resolution Melting of Small Amplicons. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.032136

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.