Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simultaneous Measurement of β-Amyloid(1–42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau (Thr181) in Cerebrospinal Fluid by the xMAP Technology

Olsson, Annika, Vanderstichele, Hugo, Andreasen, Niels, De Meyer, Geert, Wallin, Anders, Holmberg, Björn, Rosengren, Lars, Vanmechelen, Eugeen, Blennow, Kaj·2005·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: To simultaneously study several biomarkers for Alzheimer disease (AD), we used the xMAP™ technology to develop and evaluate a multiparametric bead-based assay for quantification of β-amyloid(1–42) [Aβ(1–42)], total tau (T-TAU), and hyperphosphorylated tau [P-TAU(181P)] in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Methods: We compared the new multianalyte assay format with established ELISA techniques for the same proteins. We then performed a clinical study using CSF samples from patients with AD or mild cognitive impairment with progression to AD, healthy controls, and patients with other neurologic disorders. Results: The INNO-BIA AlzBio3 selectively and specifically measured Aβ(1–42), T-TAU, and P-TAU(181P) in the CSF. The new assay format had intra- and interassay CVs <10% for all analytes, even at low concentrations. The measurement range of the new assay was 3 to 4 logs compared with 1 to 2 logs for ELISAs. By plotting the mean of the values obtained in ELISA and the xMAP technology against the difference, we found that a correction factor could be used to convert xMAP results to ELISA values. The clinical study demonstrated that the new multiparametric assay could accurately distinguish patients with AD from patients with other neurologic disorders or control patients, with the diagnostic accuracy reaching recommended consensus criteria for specificity and sensitivity. Conclusion: The new multiparametric method may be able to replace the corresponding ELISA methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2004.039347

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Olsson, A., Vanderstichele, H., Andreasen, N., De Meyer, G., Wallin, A., Holmberg, B., Rosengren, L., Vanmechelen, E., & Blennow, K.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
336-345
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2079540265
Cited by
437
References
40
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous Measurement of β-Amyloid(1–42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau (Thr181) in Cerebrospinal Fluid by the xMAP Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2004.039347
The paper
Olsson, A., Vanderstichele, H., Andreasen, N., De Meyer, G., Wallin, A., Holmberg, B., Rosengren, L., Vanmechelen, E., & Blennow, K. (2005). Simultaneous Measurement of β-Amyloid(1–42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau (Thr181) in Cerebrospinal Fluid by the xMAP Technology. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.039347

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.