Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 529

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

APTIMA PCA3 Molecular Urine Test: Development of a Method to Aid in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Groskopf, Jack, Aubin, Sheila MJ, Deras, Ina Lim, Blase, Amy, Bodrug, Sharon, Clark, Craig, Brentano, Steven, Mathis, Jeannette, Pham, Jimmykim, Meyer, Troels, Cass, Michelle, Hodge, Petrea, Macairan, Maria Luz, Marks, Leonard S, Rittenhouse, Harry·2006·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) encodes a prostate-specific mRNA that has shown promise as a prostate cancer diagnostic tool. This report describes the characterization of a prototype quantitative PCA3-based test for whole urine. Methods: Whole-urine specimens were collected after digital rectal examination from 3 groups: men scheduled for prostate biopsy (n = 70), healthy men (<45 years of age with no known prostate cancer risk factors; n = 52), and men who had undergone radical prostatectomy (n = 21). PCA3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNAs were isolated, amplified, and quantified by use of Gen-Probe DTS400® Systems. Prostate biopsy results were correlated with the PCA3/PSA mRNA ratio, and PSA mRNA concentrations were used to normalize PCA3 signals and confirm the yield of prostate-specific RNA. Assay precision, specimen stability, and mRNA yield were also evaluated. Results: The specimen informative rate (fraction of specimens yielding sufficient RNA for analysis) was 98.2%. In this clinical research study, ROC curve analysis of prebiopsy specimens yielded an area under the curve of 0.746; sensitivity was 69% and specificity 79%. Serum PSA assay specificity was 28% for this same group. PCA3 and PSA mRNAs were undetectable in postprostatectomy specimens except for one man with recurrent prostate cancer. Assay interrun CVs were ≤12%. Both mRNAs were stable in processed urine up to 5 days at 4 °C and after 5 freeze–thaw cycles. Conclusion: The APTIMA® PCA3 assay combines simple specimen processing with precise assays and existing instruments and could add specificity to the current algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2005.063289

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 529

Metadata

Authors
Groskopf, J., Aubin, S. M., Deras, I. L., Blase, A., Bodrug, S., Clark, C., Brentano, S., Mathis, J., Pham, J., Meyer, T., Cass, M., Hodge, P., Macairan, M. L., Marks, L. S., & Rittenhouse, H.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1089-1095
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2097876373
Cited by
529
References
0
FWCI
19.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: APTIMA PCA3 Molecular Urine Test: Development of a Method to Aid in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2005.063289
The paper
Groskopf, J., Aubin, S. M., Deras, I. L., Blase, A., Bodrug, S., Clark, C., Brentano, S., Mathis, J., Pham, J., Meyer, T., Cass, M., Hodge, P., Macairan, M. L., Marks, L. S., & Rittenhouse, H. (2006). APTIMA PCA3 Molecular Urine Test: Development of a Method to Aid in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.063289

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.