Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A First-Generation Multiplex Biomarker Analysis of Urine for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer

Open access
Laxman, Bharathi, Morris, David S., Yu, Jianjun, Siddiqui, Javed, Cao, Jie, Mehra, Rohit, Lonigro, Robert J., Tsodikov, Alex, Wei, John T., Tomlins, Scott A., Chinnaiyan, Arul M.·2008·Cancer Research

Abstract

Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level is currently the standard of care for prostate cancer screening in the United States, it lacks ideal specificity and additional biomarkers are needed to supplement or potentially replace serum PSA testing. Emerging evidence suggests that monitoring the noncoding RNA transcript PCA3 in urine may be useful in detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA levels. Here, we show that a multiplex panel of urine transcripts outperforms PCA3 transcript alone for the detection of prostate cancer. We measured the expression of seven putative prostate cancer biomarkers, including PCA3, in sedimented urine using quantitative PCR on a cohort of 234 patients presenting for biopsy or radical prostatectomy. By univariate analysis, we found that increased GOLPH2, SPINK1, and PCA3 transcript expression and TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status were significant predictors of prostate cancer. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a multiplexed model, including these biomarkers, outperformed serum PSA or PCA3 alone in detecting prostate cancer. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.758 for the multiplexed model versus 0.662 for PCA3 alone (P = 0.003). The sensitivity and specificity for the multiplexed model were 65.9% and 76.0%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 79.8% and 60.8%, respectively. Taken together, these results provide the framework for the development of highly optimized, multiplex urine biomarker tests for more accurate detection of prostate cancer. [Cancer Res 2008;68(3):645–9]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-3224

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Laxman, B., Morris, D. S., Yu, J., Siddiqui, J., Cao, J., Mehra, R., Lonigro, R. J., Tsodikov, A., Wei, J. T., Tomlins, S. A., & Chinnaiyan, A. M.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
645-649
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2147010946
Cited by
409
References
28
FWCI
40.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A First-Generation Multiplex Biomarker Analysis of Urine for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-3224
The paper
Laxman, B., Morris, D. S., Yu, J., Siddiqui, J., Cao, J., Mehra, R., Lonigro, R. J., Tsodikov, A., Wei, J. T., Tomlins, S. A., & Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2008). A First-Generation Multiplex Biomarker Analysis of Urine for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-3224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.