The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of 19 Cardiac Troponin I and T Assay 99th Percentile Values from a Common Presumably Healthy Population
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Between-assay comparability of 99th percentiles for cardiac troponin concentrations has not been assessed systematically in a single population for a large number of assays. METHODS: We determined 99th percentiles for 19 cardiac troponin assays in heparin plasma samples from a population of 272 and 252 presumably healthy males and females, respectively. The assays evaluated included 1 cardiac troponin T (cTnT) assay from Roche and 18 cTnI assays from Abbott, Alere, Beckman, bioMerieux, Instrumentation Laboratory, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Singulex, Siemens, and Roche. Five of these assays were categorized as high-sensitivity, 9 as sensitive-contemporary, and 5 as point-of-care (POC) assays. RESULTS: For high-sensitivity cTnI (hs-cTnI) assays 99th percentiles varied from 23 to 58 ng/L. At least 80% of individuals had measurable hs-cTnI, whereas only 25% had measurable high-sensitivity cTnT. All high-sensitivity cardic troponin assays had 99th percentiles that were 1.2–2.4-fold higher in males than females. For the 9 sensitive-contemporary cTnI assays, 99th percentiles varied from 12 to 392 ng/L, and only the Beckman assay gave measurable concentrations in a substantial portion of the population (35% vs ≤6% for the others). Seven of these 9 assays had 1.3–5.0-fold higher 99th percentiles for males than females. For 5 cTnI POC assays, 99th percentiles varied from <10 to 40 ng/L. The Instrumentation Laboratory assay gave measurable results in 27.8% of study participants vs ≤6% for the others. Correlations were generally poor among assays. CONCLUSIONS: Among cardiac troponin assays 99th percentile concentrations appear to differ. High-sensitivity assays provide measurable cardiac troponin results in a substantially greater fraction of presumably healthy individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analytical Characteristics of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays
Apple, F. S., Collinson, P. O., & for the IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (2012) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.165795 · Cited by 861
Self-citationCounterpoint: Standardization of Cardiac Troponin I Assays Will Not Occur in My Lifetime
Apple, F. S. (2012) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.166165 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
Cited by
Apple, F. S., Sandoval, Y., Jaffe, A. S., & Ordonez-Llanos, J. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.255109 · Cited by 408
Self-citationApplication of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction
Neumann, J. T., Twerenbold, R., Ojeda, F., Sörensen, N. A., Chapman, A. R., Shah, A. S. V., Anand, A., Boeddinghaus, J., Nestelberger, T., Badertscher, P., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1803377 · Cited by 346
Cardiac biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome: from history to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin
Garg, P., Morris, P., Fazlanie, A. L., Vijayan, S., Dancso, B., Dastidar, A. G., Plein, S., Mueller, C., & Haaf, P. (2017) · Internal and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11739-017-1612-1 · Cited by 319
Clinical Use of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction
Twerenbold, R., Boeddinghaus, J., Nestelberger, T., Wildi, K., Rubini Gimenez, M., Badertscher, P., & Mueller, C. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.718 · Cited by 255
Chin, C. W. L., Shah, A. S. V., McAllister, D. A., Joanna Cowell, S., Alam, S., Langrish, J. P., Strachan, F. E., Hunter, A. L., Maria Choy, A., Lang, C. C., et al. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu189 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Apple, F. S., Ler, R., & Murakami, M. M.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-11-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1574-1581
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2160843187
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of 19 Cardiac Troponin I and T Assay 99th Percentile Values from a Common Presumably Healthy Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2012.192716
- The paper
- Apple, F. S., Ler, R., & Murakami, M. M. (2012). Determination of 19 Cardiac Troponin I and T Assay 99th Percentile Values from a Common Presumably Healthy Population. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.192716
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.