Quality of life in adolescence: the role of perceived control, parenting style, and social support
Open accessAbstract
Adult levels of subjective quality of life (SQOL) are remarkably stable on a population basis. This has been explained through the operation of a homeostatic system that acts to maintain each individual's SQOL within a narrow range. However, there are good reasons to expect this homeostatic system to come under severe challenge during adolescence. Many of the variables thought to be involved in the homeostatic process are undergoing marked change during this period, including the balance between primary and secondary control, perceived social support, and interaction with parents. In order to test the stability of SQOL and the influence of these other variables, a sample of 279 adolescents between the ages of 12 to 17 years were recruited. It was found that the SQOL of the older adolescents lay below the predicted range for adults, thereby supporting the idea of a strong challenge to homeostasis during this period. A new scale to measure perceived control was found to possess a useful two-factor structure of primary and secondary control. Moreover, both of these factors, together with social support, predicted levels of SQOL, even though the levels of primary control decreased with age. Finally, adolescents who perceived an authoritarian parenting style experienced a higher SQOL than those who perceived an unengaged style. These findings contribute to our understanding of SQOL homeostasis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
A life-span theory of control.
Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.284 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
Social support and health: a review
Callaghan, P., & Morrissey, J. (1993) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18020203.x · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The Effect of Parental Supportive Behaviors on Life Satisfaction of Adolescent Offspring
Young, M. H., Miller, B. C., Norton, M. C., & Hill, E. J. (1995) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353934 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Renty, J. O., & Roeyers, H. (2006) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361306066604 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Pedometers and Text Messaging to Increase Physical Activity
Newton, K. H., Wiltshire, E. J., & Elley, C. R. (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-1974 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
A hope intervention for adolescents: a randomized controlled trial delivered by paraprofessionals
Scioli, A., MacPherson, N., Murphy, R., Gooding, T., Love, M., Lyons, K. D., & Adachi-Mejia, A. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528504 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Petito, F., & Cummins, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cummins, Robert A.
- ORCID
- Cummins, Robert A.
- Venue
- Behaviour Change
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 196-207
- ISSN
- 0813-4839 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-7768
- OpenAlex
- W2123105101
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Behaviour Change (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Keywords
- subjective quality of life, adolescence, perceived control, primary control, secondary control, parenting styles, authoritarian parenting, social support, homeostasis, scale development, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review