The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Clinical Practice of a Community Rehabilitation Team for People with Acquired Brain Injury
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the clinical practice of a community team that is one component of the statewide, government-funded, specialist Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program for New South Wales, Australia. The 467 clients served by the community team of the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney during the calendar year 2000 were identified and their use of clinical services described. A random sample of 50 clients from this group was studied in further detail, with specific reference to the type of therapy interventions they received. This was compared with the therapy interventions received 2 years later, in 2002. A total of 8046 occasions of service (OoS) were recorded for the 467 clients during 2000, with a median number of 8 OoS per client. All disciplines contributed to this number, with case managers providing the largest number of OoS (n = 2734). Between 65–75% of clients attended medical clinics and received services from case managers, with between 15–30% of clients receiving services from allied health disciplines. The random sample received a median of 9 OoS during 2000, and a median of 3 therapy interventions per client. Therapy interventions pertaining to living skills were addressed in 66% of the group, interpersonal relationships in 54%, and occupational activity in 44%. Although the community team continued to provide a comparable number of OoS in 2000 and 2002, 56% of the random sample had been discharged by 2002. There…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury
OLVER, J. H., PONSFORD, J. L., & CURRAN, C. A. (1996) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990596123945 · Cited by 503
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Broe, G.A., Lulham, J.M., Strettles, B., Tate, R.L., Walsh, C.A. & Ross, G. (1982). The concept of head injury rehabilitation. In G.A. Broe, R.L. Tate (Eds.):Brain Impairment. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Brain Impairment Conference. (pp. 59?68). Sydney: The Postgraduate Committee in Medicine of the University of Sydney.
- Brookes, 1995, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation., 10, 1, 10.1097/00001199-199508000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1080/026990599121476 · DOI
- Harrison-Felix, 1996, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11, 1, 10.1097/00001199-199610000-00002 · DOI
- High, 1995, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 64, 10.1097/00001199-199508000-00007 · DOI
- Hodgkinson, 2000, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 1208, 10.1097/00001199-200012000-00003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Jennett, 1981, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 44, 285, 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285 · DOI
- Oddy, 1985, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 48, 564, 10.1136/jnnp.48.6.564 · DOI
- Ponsford, 1995, Brain Injury, 9, 11, 10.3109/02699059509004566 · DOI
- Rowlands, 2000, Brain Impairment, 1, 151, 10.1375/brim.1.2.151 · DOI
- Sander, 1996, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation., 11, 70, 10.1097/00001199-199610000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050310001641183 · DOI
- 10.1375/brim.4.1.0.27033 · DOI
- Tate, 1989, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 52, 1128, 10.1136/jnnp.52.10.1128 · DOI
- Tate, R.L., Strettles, B. & Osoteo, T. (2003). Enhancing outcomes after traumatic brain injury: A social rehabilitation approach. In B.A. Wilson (Ed.),Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Theory and practice. (pp. 137?169). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
- Thomsen, 1984, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 47, 260, 10.1136/jnnp.47.3.260 · DOI
- Wood, 1997, Brain Injury, 11, 491, 10.1080/bij.11.7.491.501 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Simpson, G. K., Tate, R. L., Whiting, D. L., & Cotter, R. E. (2011) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e3182225250 · Cited by 88
Self-citationWhiting, D., Deane, F., McLeod, H., Ciarrochi, J., & Simpson, G. (2020) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2019.1583582 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Tate, R. L., Strettles, B., & Osoteo, T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Liverpool Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tate, Robyn L.
- ORCID
- Tate, Robyn L.
- Venue
- Brain Impairment
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-92
- ISSN
- 1443-9646 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-5252
- OpenAlex
- W2066454372
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Impairment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- acquired brain injury, community-based rehabilitation, clinical practice model, therapeutic interventions, case management, service utilization, discharge, life skills, occupational activity, interpersonal relationships, allied health services, New South Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review