Cited by 79Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Why More Boys Than Girls With ADHD Receive Treatment: A Study of Dutch Twins

Open access
Derks, Eske M., Hudziak, James J., Boomsma, Dorret I.·2007·Twin Research and Human Genetics

Abstract

More boys than girls with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) receive treatment. One explanation for this bias may be that boys score higher on disruptive behavior scales than girls. Although this was supported by findings in clinical samples, recent studies in nonreferred samples showed that boys and girls with ADHD are similar with respect to their levels of disruptive behavior as reported by their mother. In this report, we investigate whether the difference in treatment rate is associated with higher teacher problem scores in boys with ADHD than in girls with ADHD. Data were obtained from mothers and teachers in a nonreferred sample of 283 boys and 291 girls with and without ADHD. Children were selected when they scored either low (controls) or high (probands) on attention problems. Mothers completed DSM-IV interviews, Child Behavior Checklists (CBCL) and the Conners Rating Scale (CRS). Teachers filled in the Teacher Report Form (TRF), and the CRS. Boys and girls with ADHD had similar levels of psychiatric illness and school impairment (such as being held back, special class placement and learning problems) by mother report. Mothers reported similar levels of aggression and attention problems in boys and girls with ADHD. In contrast, teachers consistently rated boys with ADHD as having higher scores on reports of attention problems and aggression than girls with ADHD. Gender differences vary across settings: boys and girls with ADHD are rated as behaving differently at school, but not at home. The higher level of teacher reported problem behavior at school may explain the high male–female ratio for ADHD in clinical settings. These findings have implications for the results of genetic studies that rely on referred samples, as these studies may give a distorted view of sex differences in the population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1375/twin.10.5.765

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previously reported higher male-to-female ADHD ratios may have been a function of referral or treatment bias, as a higher proportion of boys than girls with ADHD receive treatment.

    “This finding suggests that previously reported higher ratios may have been a function of referral or treatment bias, as it is known that a higher proportion of boys than girls with ADHD receive treatment”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Task force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder: DSM-IV (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Barkley, R. A. (2002). Major life activity and health out- comes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63, 10-15.
  3. Biederman, J., Kwon, A., Aleardi, M., Chouinard, V. A., Marino, T., Cole, H., Mick, E., & Faraone, S. V. (2005). Absence of gender effects on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Findings in nonreferred sub- jects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1083-1089.
  4. Biederman, J., Mick, E., Faraone, S. V., Braaten, E., Doyle, A., Spencer, T., Wilens, T. E., Frazier, E., & Johnson, M. A. (2002). Influence of gender on atten- tion deficit hyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatric clinic. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 36-42.
  5. Carlson, C. L., Tamm, L., & Gaub, M. (1997). Gender differences in children with ADHD, ODD, and co- occurring ADHD/ODD identified in a school population. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1706-1714.
  6. Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D., & Epstein, J. N. (1998a). Revision and restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): Factor struc- ture, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 279-291.
  7. Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D., & Epstein, J. N. (1998b). The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 257-268.
  8. Gaub, M. & Carlson, C. L. (1997). Gender differences in ADHD: A meta-analysis and critical review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1036-1045.
  9. Levy, F., Hay, D. A., Bennett, K. S., & McStephen, M. (2005). Gender differences in ADHD subtype comor- bidity. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 368-376.
  10. Nolan, E. E., Gadow, K. D., & Sprafkin, J. (2001). Teacher reports of DSM-IV ADHD, ODD, and CD symptoms in schoolchildren. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 241-249.
  11. Reich, W., Huang, H. Y., & Todd, R. D. (2006). ADHD medication use in a population-based sample of twins. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 801-807.
  12. Shaffer, D., Schwabstone, M., Fisher, P., Cohen, P., Piacentini, J., Davies, M., Conners, C. K., & Regier, D. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Revised Version (Disc-R). 1. Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 643-650.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derks, E. M., Hudziak, J. J., & Boomsma, D. I.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Derks, Eske M.
Venue
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Published
2007-10-01
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
765-770
ISSN
  • 1832-4274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-2628
OpenAlex
W2031008482
Cited by
79
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Twin Research and Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sex differences, treatment seeking, gender bias in diagnosis, teacher ratings, disruptive behavior, aggression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Prejudice, Comorbidity, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review