The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Cognitive Ability And Poor Skill With Numbers May Prevent Many From Enrolling In Medicare Supplemental Coverage
Abstract
Because traditional Medicare leaves substantial gaps in coverage, many people obtain supplemental coverage to limit their exposure to out-of-pocket costs. However, some Medicare beneficiaries may not be well equipped to navigate the complex supplemental coverage landscape successfully because of their lower cognitive ability or numeracy--that is, the ability to work with numbers. We found that people in the lower third of the cognitive ability and numeracy distributions were at least eleven percentage points less likely than those in the upper third to enroll in a supplemental Medicare insurance plan. This result means that many Medicare beneficiaries do not have the financial protections and other benefits that would be available to them if they were enrolled in a supplemental insurance plan. Our findings suggest that policy makers may want to consider alternatives tailored to these high-need groups, such as enhanced education and enrollment programs, simpler sets of plan choices, or even some type of automatic enrollment with an option to decline coverage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321947001 · Cited by 1,874
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Goldman D, 2012, J Appl Econom
- 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132 · DOI
- 10.1086/587623 · DOI
- 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03376-3 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.89.1.95 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-008-0612-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116410 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.53.1.9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/geronj/45.4.P145 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/57.8.M523 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.81.9.1153 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01321315 · DOI
- 10.1177/089826439100300102 · DOI
- 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.741 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X0102100105 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0022028 · DOI
- Greene J, 2008, Am J Manag Care, 14, 369
- 10.1257/089533005775196732 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02395.x · DOI
- 10.1093/geronb/52B.Special_Issue.37 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1159/000109998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.11.006 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2008.158485 · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjr055 · DOI
- Hsee C, 2000, Choices, values, and frames, 543, 10.1017/CBO9780511803475.032 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.629 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00039.x · DOI
- 10.1177/107755870205900106 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00111-4 · DOI
- Thaler RH, 2008, Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Christensen, J., Aarøe, L., Baekgaard, M., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13134 · Cited by 458
“Those with more cognitive limitations are less likely to have any supplemental coverage compared with those with more preserved cognitive abilities, placing the former at substantial risk of extremely high out-of-pocket costs (Chan and Elbel 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, S., & Elbel, B.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- ORCID
- Elbel, Brian
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1847-1854
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2131639907
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- Medicare supplemental insurance, Medicare Part D, cognitive ability, numeracy, insurance enrollment, out-of-pocket costs, health insurance coverage gaps, automatic enrollment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Decision Making, Humans, Mathematics, United States, Medicare Part B, Comprehension, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review