Cited by 44Diabetes Management and EducationPrimary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Chronic care model strategies in the United States and Germany deliver patient-centered, high-quality diabetes care

Stock, Stephanie, Pitcavage, James M., Simic, Dusan, Altin, Sibel, Graf, Christian, Feng, Wen, Graf, Thomas R.·2014·Health Affairs

Abstract

Improving the quality of care for chronic diseases is an important issue for most health care systems in industrialized nations. One widely adopted approach is the Chronic Care Model (CCM), which was first developed in the late 1990s. In this article we present the results from two large surveys in the United States and Germany that report patients' experiences in different models of patient-centered diabetes care, compared to the experiences of patients who received routine diabetes care in the same systems. The study populations were enrolled in either Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania or Barmer, a German sickness fund that provides medical insurance nationwide. Our findings suggest that patients with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in the care models that exhibited key features of the CCM were more likely to receive care that was patient-centered, high quality, and collaborative, compared to patients who received routine care. This study demonstrates that quality improvement can be realized through the application of the Chronic Care Model, regardless of the setting or distinct characteristics of the program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0428

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An integrated, structured approach to AF care, as applied successfully to other domains of medicine, will facilitate consistent, guideline-adherent AF management for all patients, with the potential to improve outcomes.

    “An integrated, structured approach to AF care, as applied successfully to other domains of medicine, 322-324 will facilitate consistent, guideline-adherent AF management for all patients 325 (Figure 6), with the potential to improve outcomes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stock, S., Pitcavage, J. M., Simic, D., Altin, S., Graf, C., Feng, W., & Graf, T. R.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Dusan Simic is a scientific associate at the Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne.
  • Christian Graf is head of the Department of Product Development, Health Care Management, and Prevention at Barmer, in Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Geisinger Health System (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2014-09
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1540-1548
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2027009401
Cited by
44
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
Chronic Care Model, type 2 diabetes, patient-centered care, quality of care, patient experience, care coordination, quality improvement, models of care, Geisinger Health System, Barmer, United States and Germany comparison
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Germany, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Pennsylvania, Quality of Health Care, United States, Models, Organizational, Patient-Centered Care, Disease Management, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review