Cited by 74Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare Systems and PracticesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Applying A 3.0 Transformation Framework To Guide Large-Scale Health System Reform

Halfon, Neal, Long, Peter, Chang, Debbie I., Hester, James, Inkelas, Moira, Rodgers, Anthony·2014·Health Affairs

Abstract

Implementation of the Affordable Care Act is unleashing historic new efforts aimed at reforming the US health system. Many important incremental improvements are under way, yet there is a growing recognition that more transformative changes are necessary if the health care system is to do a better job of optimizing population health. While the concept of the Triple Aim-dedicated to improving the experience of care, the health of populations, and lowering per capita costs of care-has been used to help health care providers and health care systems focus their efforts on costs, quality, and outcomes, it does not provide a roadmap for a new system. In this article we describe the 3.0 Transformation Framework we developed to stimulate thinking and support the planning and development of the new roadmap for the next generation of the US health care system. With a focus on optimizing population health over the life span, the framework suggests how a system designed to better manage chronic disease care could evolve into a system designed to enhance population health. We describe how the 3.0 Transformation Framework has been used and applied in national, state, and local settings, and we suggest potential next steps for its wider application and use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0485

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health systems are being transformed by the needs of chronic disease management, health promotion, management of health risks at a population level, and paying for outcomes (vs. fee-for-service).

    “Health systems are being transformed by the needs of chronic disease management, health promotion, management of health risks at a population level, and paying for outcomes (vs. fee-for-service) [64].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halfon, N., Long, P., Chang, D. I., Hester, J., Inkelas, M., & Rodgers, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Blue Shield of California Foundation (US)
  • Debbie I. Chang is vice president of Policy and Prevention at Nemours, in Newark, Delaware.
  • James Hester is a senior adviser at Population Health Systems, in Burlington, Vermont.
  • Anthony Rodgers is a principal at Health Management Associates, in San Francisco.
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2014-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
2003-2011
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2113763627
Cited by
74
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
health care reform, Triple Aim, population health, Affordable Care Act, chronic care, health care costs, quality of care, health care outcomes, health system redesign, health planning
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Planning, Humans, United States, Health Care Reform, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review