Cited by 567Child and Adolescent HealthBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Lifecourse Health Development: Past, Present and Future

Open access
Halfon, Neal, Larson, Kandyce, Lu, Michael, Tullis, Ericka, Russ, Shirley·2014·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

During the latter half of the twentieth century, an explosion of research elucidated a growing number of causes of disease and contributors to health. Biopsychosocial models that accounted for the wide range of factors influencing health began to replace outmoded and overly simplified biomedical models of disease causation. More recently, models of lifecourse health development (LCHD) have synthesized research from biological, behavioral and social science disciplines, defined health development as a dynamic process that begins before conception and continues throughout the lifespan, and paved the way for the creation of novel strategies aimed at optimization of individual and population health trajectories. As rapid advances in epigenetics and biological systems research continue to inform and refine LCHD models, our healthcare delivery system has struggled to keep pace, and the gulf between knowledge and practice has widened. This paper attempts to chart the evolution of the LCHD framework, and illustrate its potential to transform how the MCH system addresses social, psychological, biological, and genetic influences on health, eliminates health disparities, reduces chronic illness, and contains healthcare costs. The LCHD approach can serve to highlight the foundational importance of MCH, moving it from the margins of national debate to the forefront of healthcare reform efforts. The paper concludes with suggestions for innovations that could accelerate the translation of health development principles into MCH practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-013-1346-2

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual traits that allow adaptive or maladaptive outcomes depend upon the unique neurological capacity of each individual, which is built upon experiences in the life course, particularly those early in life.

    “The individual traits that allow these adaptive or maladaptive outcomes depend upon the unique neurological capacity of each individual, which is built upon experiences in the life course, particularly those early in life.”

    From Neurobiological and Systemic Effects of Chronic Stress (2017) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [98]Forrest, C. Toward a theory of health as livingness. Medical Hypotheses (in press).
  2. [123]Larson, K., Kahn, R., Flores, G., Cheng, T., Russ, S., & Halfon, N. (2013). Maternal and child health disparities: A life-course health development perspective and future research directions. Maternal and Child Health Journal (under review). 31314286

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halfon, N., Larson, K., Lu, M., Tullis, E., & Russ, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Corresponding author
Halfon, Neal
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2013-08-22
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
344-365
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W1988065397
Cited by
567
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
58.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
  • Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
biopsychosocial model, etiology, epigenetics, maternal and child health, health disparities, chronic disease prevention, health care costs, health care reform, knowledge-practice gap, health trajectories, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Critical Period, Psychological, Health Policy, Health Status, Humans, Human Development, Maternal-Child Health Centers, Models, Biological, Public Health, Biomedical Research, Fetal Development, Systems Biology, Epigenomics, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review