Cited by 88Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Meta-Analysis Of Antenatal Depression And Adverse Birth Outcomes In US Populations, 2010–20: Study is a meta-analysis of antenatal depression and adverse birth outcomes in the US, 2010–20.

Simonovich, Shannon D., Nidey, Nichole L., Gavin, Amelia R., Piñeros-Leaño, María, Hsieh, Wan-Jung, Sbrilli, Marissa D., Ables-Torres, Lauren A., Huang, Hsiang +2 more·2021·Health Affairs

Abstract

Untreated depression presents a distinct set of risks for pregnancy complications. Past studies have connected antenatal depression with adverse birth outcomes. The purpose of this study was to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between depression during pregnancy and associated adverse birth outcomes in US populations during the period 2010-20. As a trend, disparities in adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal morbidities for Black pregnant people compared with those for White pregnant people continue to rise. Addressing mental health conditions during pregnancy has the potential to ameliorate a large and excessive burden on adverse birth outcomes among childbearing people and their offspring. Policy solutions to encourage, mandate, and reimburse universal depression screening during pregnancy are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00801

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marginalized populations with limited resources are at increased risk for perinatal mental health conditions.

    “Attendance is lower among marginalized populations who may have limited resources [64, 65]; these populations are also at increased risk for perinatal mental health conditions [9, 66].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonovich, S. D., Nidey, N. L., Gavin, A. R., Piñeros-Leaño, M., Hsieh, W.-J., Sbrilli, M. D., Ables-Torres, L. A., Huang, H., Ryckman, K., & Tabb, K. M.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Boston College (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
1560-1565
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W3204665673
Cited by
82
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
antenatal depression, adverse birth outcomes, pregnancy complications, maternal mental health, racial disparities, depression screening in pregnancy, maternal morbidity, untreated depression
MeSH terms
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review