Cited by 36Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMental Health Treatment and Access

Trends in antenatal depression and suicidal ideation diagnoses among commercially insured childbearing individuals in the United States, 2008–2018

Open access
Tabb, K.M., Dalton, V.K., Tilea, A., Kolenic, G.E., Admon, L.K., Hall, S.V., Zhang, X., Ryckman, K.K. +1 more·2023·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antenatal depression and suicidal ideation represent serious pregnancy-related complications, yet comprehensive estimates of the prevalence and predictors of these diagnoses among birthing people remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize trends in the prevalence of depression and suicidal ideation diagnoses identified among pregnant individuals prior to giving birth. METHODS: This study included 536,647 individuals aged 15-44 years continuously enrolled in a single commercial health insurance plan for one year before childbirth from 2008 to 2018. The primary outcomes included depression or suicidal ideation based on identification of the relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes during pregnancy. RESULTS: Rates (95 % CIs) of depression increased by 39 % from 540 (520-560) per 10,000 individuals in 2008 to 750 (730-770) per 10,000 individuals in 2018. Suicidal ideation increased by 100 % from 15 (12-18) per 10,000 individuals in 2008 to 44 (39-50) per 10,000 individuals in 2018. Black birthing people experiencing the sharpest proportional increases. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of depression and suicidal ideation occurring during pregnancy substantially increased over a ten-year period. Further, suicidal ideation diagnosis increased the most for among Black birthing people compared to all groups, resulting in a need for future studies in this area to determine the reasons for an increase in diagnosis and any change in resulting treatment of follow up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.120

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal distress presents serious health consequences for pregnant individuals, including diminished functioning, impaired interpersonal relationships, less responsive parenting, and in extreme cases suicide.

    “Maternal distress presents serious health consequences for pregnant individuals, including diminished functioning, impaired interpersonal relationships, less responsive parenting, and—in extreme cases—suicide (O’Hara and McCabe 2013; Tabb et al. 2023).”

    From Effects of a Personalized Stress Management Intervention on Maternal Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. (2025) · cites this paper as Tabb et al. 2023

    The Introduction (page not provided) describes depression and suicidal ideation as serious complications during pregnancy and major risk factors for mortality or morbidity; it also says untreated perinatal depression has profound effects. It does not specify diminished functioning, impaired interpersonal relationships, or less responsive parenting, and it discusses suicidal ideation rather than explicitly identifying suicide as an outcome of maternal distress. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Davis NL, Smoots AN, Goodman DA, 2019. Pregnancy-related deaths: data from 14 US maternal mortality review committees. Education 40, 8– 2. PMC11135281 34606354

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tabb, K. M., Dalton, V. K., Tilea, A., Kolenic, G. E., Admon, L. K., Hall, S. V., Zhang, X., Ryckman, K. K., & Zivin, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Tabb, K.M.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
320
Pages
263-267
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297321896
Cited by
36
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Office of Research on Women's Health
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01 MD014958)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
antenatal depression, suicidal ideation, pregnancy, prevalence trends, commercial health insurance, Black birthing people, racial disparities, ICD-10 codes, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review