Cited by 64Healthcare Policy and ManagementMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth, Medicine and Society

Design of mental health benefits: Still unequal after all these years

Barry, Colleen L., Gabel, Jon R., Frank, Richard G., Hawkins, Samantha, Whitmore, Heidi H., Pickreign, Jeremy D.·2003·Health Affairs

Abstract

This paper examines recent trends in the design and organization of coverage for mental health care using data from a Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust (KFF/HRET) national employer survey. Legislation and changes in the delivery of mental health services have altered how mental health insurance is bought and sold. However, our findings reveal that mental health coverage is still typically not offered at a level equivalent to coverage for other medical conditions. We attempt to synthesize these data with prior research as a foundation for informed debates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.22.5.127

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barry, C. L., Gabel, J. R., Frank, R. G., Hawkins, S., Whitmore, H. H., & Pickreign, J. D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2003-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
127-137
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2170276700
Cited by
64
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH19733-08, T32MH019733)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
mental health coverage, employer-sponsored health insurance, mental health parity, health insurance law, mental health service delivery, health insurance premiums
MeSH terms
Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Humans, Insurance, Psychiatric, Managed Care Programs, Mental Health Services, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychotropic Drugs, United States, Insurance Coverage, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review