Cited by 313Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesGender Roles and Identity Studies

Reliability and validity of the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale-Short Form

Elhai, Jon D., Schweinle, William, Anderson, Susan M.·2008·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

We examined the reliability and validity of the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale-Short Form (ATSPPH-SF), a widely cited measure of mental health treatment attitudes. Data from 296 college students and 389 primary care patients were analyzed. The ATSPPH-SF evidenced adequate internal consistency. Higher scores (indicating more positive treatment attitudes) were associated with less treatment-related stigma, and greater intentions to seek treatment in the future. No associations were found for mental health impairment or depression. The ATSPPH-SF was related to the recent use of mental health treatment and recent treatment intensity (i.e., visit counts); after controlling for demographic variables associated with treatment use, this relationship held in predicting previous use from non-use, but not visit counts. Factor-analytic findings demonstrated that a two-factor model (Openness to Seeking Treatment for Emotional Problems, and Value and Need in Seeking Treatment) represented the data well. Implications for future research on mental healthcare use correlates are discussed, as well as the need for enhancing peoples' attitudes toward treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.04.020

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elhai, J. D., Schweinle, W., & Anderson, S. M.
Affiliations
University of South Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Elhai, Jon D.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
320-329
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089618989
Cited by
313
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
treatment attitudes, mental health treatment seeking, mental health service utilization, treatment intensity, university students, primary care patients, psychometric validation, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patients, Personality Inventory, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review