The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical Groups’ Adoption Of Electronic Health Records And Information Systems
Abstract
We surveyed a nationally representative sample of medical group practices to assess their current use of information technology (IT). Our results suggest that adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is progressing slowly, at least in smaller practices, although a number of group practices plan to implement an EHR within the next two years. Moreover, the process of choosing and implementing an EHR appears to be more complex and varied than we expected. This suggests a need for greater support for practices, particularly smaller ones, in this quest if the benefits expected from EHRs are to be realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions
Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116 · Cited by 866
A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care
Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., Bardon, C. G., Spurr, C. D., Carchidi, P. J., Kittler, A. F., Goldszer, R. C., Fairchild, D. G., Sussman, A. J., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00057-3 · Cited by 740
The Future of Family Medicine: A Collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community
Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.130 · Cited by 642
Paying For Quality: Providers’ Incentives For Quality Improvement
Rosenthal, M. B., Fernandopulle, R., Song, H. R., & Landon, B. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.127 · Cited by 398
The Barriers to Electronic Medical Record Systems and How to Overcome Them
McDonald, C. J. (1997) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1997.0040213 · Cited by 378
The economic effect of implementing an EMR in an outpatient clinical setting.
Barlow, S., Johnson, J., & Steck, J. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 59
Cited by
Electronic Health Record Use and the Quality of Ambulatory Care in the United States
Linder, J. A., Ma, J., Bates, D. W., Middleton, B., & Stafford, R. S. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.13.1400 · Cited by 438
The use of health information technology in seven nations
Jha, A. K., Doolan, D., Grandt, D., Scott, T., & Bates, D. W. (2008) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.007 · Cited by 420
McGinn, C. A., Grenier, S., Duplantie, J., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Légaré, F., & Gagnon, M.-P. (2011) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-46 · Cited by 393
Jha, A. K., Ferris, T. G., Donelan, K., DesRoches, C., Shields, A., Rosenbaum, S., & Blumenthal, D. (2006) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496 · Cited by 304
Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review
Li, J., Talaei-Khoei, A., Seale, H., Ray, P., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2013) · interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.2468 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1323-1333
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W1990743371
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 56.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Groups’ Adoption Of Electronic Health Records And Information Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1323
- The paper
- Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B. (2005). Medical Groups’ Adoption Of Electronic Health Records And Information Systems. Health Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
