The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening for Lung Cancer*
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- Mandel, 1993, Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood, N Engl J Med, 328, 1365, 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901 · DOI · Paper page
- Hardcastle, 1996, Randomized controlled trial of faecal-occult blood screening for colorectal cancer, Lancet, 348, 1472, 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Kronborg, 1996, Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult blood test, Lancet, 348, 1467, 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Fontana, 1986, Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program, J Occup Med, 28, 746, 10.1097/00043764-198608000-00038 · DOI · Paper page
- Fontana, 1984, Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study, Am Rev Respir Dis, 130, 561
- Fontana, 1991, Screening for lung cancer: a critique of the Mayo Lung Project, Cancer, 67, 1155, 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4+<1155::AID-CNCR2820671509>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Gatta, 1999, Variations in survival for invasive cervical cancer among European women, 1978–1989, Cancer Causes Control, 10, 575, 10.1023/A:1008959211777 · DOI
- Kjellgren, 1986, Mass screening in Sweden for cancer of the uterine cervix: effect on incidence and mortality, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 22, 57, 10.1159/000298892 · doi:10.1159/000298892
- Gotzsche, 2000, Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?, Lancet, 355, 129, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06065-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Charatan, 2002, US panel finds insufficient evidence to support mammography, BMJ, 324, 255, 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.255 · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7332.255
- Feuer, 1999, Interpreting trends in prostate cancer: part II. Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality. Cancer Surveillance Series, J Natl Cancer Inst, 91, 1025, 10.1093/jnci/91.12.1025 · DOI
- Hankey, 1999, Interpreting trends in prostate cancer: part I. Evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates. Cancer Surveillance Series, J Natl Cancer Inst, 91, 1017, 10.1093/jnci/91.12.1017 · DOI · Paper page
- Black, 2002, All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening, J Natl Cancer Inst, 94, 167, 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167 · DOI · Paper page
- Brett, 1969, Earlier diagnosis and survival in lung cancer, BMJ, 4, 260, 10.1136/bmj.4.5678.260 · DOI · Paper page
- Brett, 1968, The value of lung cancer detection by six-monthly chest radiographs, Thorax, 23, 414, 10.1136/thx.23.4.414 · doi:10.1136/thx.23.4.414
- Boucot, 1973, Is curable lung cancer detected by semiannual screening?, JAMA, 224, 1361, 10.1001/jama.1973.03220240015004 · doi:10.1001/jama.1973.03220240015004
- Lilienfeld, 1966, An evaluation of radiologic and cytologic screening for the early detection of lung cancer: a cooperative pilot study of the American Cancer Society and the Veterans Administration, Cancer Res, 26, 2083
- Berlin, 2000, Overview of the NCI Cooperative Early Lung Cancer Detection Program, Cancer, 89, 2349, 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2349::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-4 · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2349::aid-cncr6>3.0.co;2-4
- Kubik, 1986, Lung cancer detection: results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia, Cancer, 57, 2427, 10.1002/1097-0142(19860615)57:12<2427::AID-CNCR2820571230>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI · Paper page
- Frost, 1984, Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins Study, Am Rev Respir Dis, 130, 549
- Tockman, 1986, Lung cancer screening: the Johns Hopkins study, Chest, 89, 324, 10.1378/chest.89.4_Supplement.324S-a · DOI · Paper page
- Melamed, 2000, Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York study, Cancer, 89, 2356, 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2356::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-Z · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2356::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-z
- Marcus, 2000, Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 1308, 10.1093/jnci/92.16.1308 · DOI · Paper page
- Kubik, 2000, Czech Study on Lung Cancer Screening: post-trial follow-up of lung cancer deaths up to year 15 since enrollment, Cancer, 89, 2363, 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2363::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-W · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2363::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-w
- Prorok, 1984, UICC workshop on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer, Int J Cancer, 34, 1, 10.1002/ijc.2910340102 · DOI
- Eddy, 1989, Screening for lung cancer, Ann Intern Med, 111, 232, 10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-232 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-232
- Patz, 2000, Screening for lung cancer, N Engl J Med, 343, 1627, 10.1056/NEJM200011303432208 · DOI · Paper page
- Bailar, 1984, Screening for lung cancer: where are we now?, Am Rev Respir Dis, 130, 541
- Okamoto, 1999, Evaluation of a clinic-based screening program for lung cancer with a case-control design in Kanagawa, Japan, Lung Cancer, 25, 77, 10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00046-X · doi:10.1016/s0169-5002(99)00046-x
- Gohagan, 2000, The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status, Control Clin Trial, 21, 251S, 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00097-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Prorok, 2000, Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, Control Clin Trial, 21, 273S, 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00098-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Sone, 1998, Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner, Lancet, 351, 1242, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08229-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaneko, 1996, Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT vs radiography, Radiology, 201, 798, 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939234 · DOI · Paper page
- Kakinuma, 1999, Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings, Radiology, 212, 61, 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jn1461 · DOI
- Henschke, 1999, Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening, Lancet, 354, 99, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06093-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Feinstein, 2000, Epidemiology of lung cancer, Chest Surg Clin N Am, 10, 653
- Henschke, 2001, Early Lung Cancer Action Project: a summary of the findings on baseline screening, Oncologist, 6, 147, 10.1634/theoncologist.6-2-147 · DOI
- Henschke, 2001, Early Lung Cancer Action Project: initial findings on repeat screenings, Cancer, 92, 153, 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<153::AID-CNCR1303>3.0.CO;2-S · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<153::aid-cncr1303>3.0.co;2-s
- Swenson, 2002, Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 165, 433
- Sobue, 2002, Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project, J Clin Oncol, 20, 911, 10.1200/JCO.20.4.911 · doi:10.1200/jco.20.4.911
- Sone, 2001, Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner, Br J Cancer, 84, 25, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1531 · DOI · Paper page
- Miettinen, 2001, Screening for lung cancer [letter], N Engl J Med, 344, 935, 10.1056/NEJM200103223441213 · doi:10.1056/nejm200103223441213
- Jett, 2001, Spiral computed tomography screening for lung cancer is ready for prime time, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163, 812, 10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.16342a · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.16342a
- Patz, 2001, Low-dose spiral computed tomography screening for lung cancer: not ready for prime time, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163, 813, 10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.16342b · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.16342b
- 2001, Lung screening study ties up advisors, board sends it back to NCI for revision, Cancer Lett, 27, 1
- Grannis, 2001, Lung cancer overdiagnosis bias: “the gyanousa am loose!”, Chest, 119, 322, 10.1378/chest.119.2.322-a · doi:10.1378/chest.119.2.322-a
- Heffner, 2002, CT screening for lung cancer, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 165, 433, 10.1164/ajrccm.165.4.2112073a · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.165.4.2112073a
- Dammas, 2001, Identification of small lung nodules at autopsy: implications for lung cancer screening and overdiagnosis bias, Lung Cancer, 33, 11, 10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00190-8 · DOI
- Ettinger, 1996, NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) non-small cell lung cancer practice guidelines, Oncology, 10, S81
- Bach, 1999, Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer, N Engl J Med, 341, 1198, 10.1056/NEJM199910143411606 · DOI · Paper page
- Flehinger, 1992, The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer, Chest, 101, 1013, 10.1378/chest.101.4.1013 · DOI · Paper page
- Lederle, 1994, Lung cancer surgery: a critical review of the evidence, Arch Intern Med, 154, 2397, 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420210021003 · doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420210021003
- Swenson, 2002, Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 165, 508, 10.1164/ajrccm.165.4.2107006 · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.165.4.2107006
- Black, 2000, Overdiagnosis: an underrecognized cause of confusion and harm in cancer screening, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 1280, 10.1093/jnci/92.16.1280 · DOI · Paper page
- Fireman, 1997, Cost of care for cancer in a health maintenance organization, Health Care Financ Rev, 18, 51
- Marshall, 2001, Potential cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for lung cancer (LC) in a high risk cohort, Lung Cancer, 32, 227, 10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00239-7 · doi:10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00239-7
- Marshall, 2001, Economic decision analysis model of screening for lung cancer, Eur J Cancer, 37, 1759, 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00205-2 · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00205-2
- Miettinen, 2000, Screening for lung cancer: can it be cost-effective?, Can Med Assoc J, 162, 1431
- McFarlane, 1986, Clinical features of lung cancers discovered as a postmortem “surprise.”, Chest, 90, 520, 10.1378/chest.90.4.520 · doi:10.1378/chest.90.4.520
Cited by
Akhbarizadeh, R., Dobaradaran, S., Amouei Torkmahalleh, M., Saeedi, R., Aibaghi, R., & Faraji Ghasemi, F. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110339 · Cited by 465
A comprehensive review of metabolic and genomic aspects of PAH-degradation
Sakshi, & Haritash, A. K. (2020) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-020-01929-5 · Cited by 273
Liquid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review
Jalili, V., Barkhordari, A., & Ghiasvand, A. (2020) · Reviews in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1515/revac-2020-0101 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Bach, P. B., Kelley, M. J., Tate, R. C., & McCrory, D. C.
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72S-82S
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066283188
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for Lung Cancer*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.72s
- The paper
- Bach, P. B., Kelley, M. J., Tate, R. C., & McCrory, D. C. (2003). Screening for Lung Cancer*. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.72s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.