Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

Kaufmann, Mary Elizabeth·2003·Molecular Bacteriology

Abstract

Pulsed- field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was first described by Schwartz and Cantor (1) It is now an umbrella term for the alternating of an electric field in more than one direction through a solid matrix to achieve the separation of DNA fragments. The method requires the preparation of unsheared DNA, digestion of the DNA using a rare-cutting restriction endonuclease, separation of fragments by PFGE, and the visualization and interpretation of banding patterns Fig. 1.Conventional agarose gel electrophoresis employs a static field and can resolve DNA fragments up to 50 kilobases (kb), although in practice, fragments larger than 20 kb co-migrate under the conditions usually applied. By introducing a pulse or change in the direction of the electric field, fragments as large as 10 megabases (Mb) can be separated. The time required by DNA fragments of different sizes to reorientate to the new electric field is proportional to their molecular weight and it is this factor that allows the separation and focusing of DNA fragments. Fig 1. Practical steps involved in PFGE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/0-89603-498-4:33

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Kaufmann, M. E.
Venue
Molecular Bacteriology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2003-11-14
Volume
15
Pages
33-50
OpenAlex
W71214772
Cited by
367
References
0
FWCI
92.36
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1385/0-89603-498-4:33
The paper
Kaufmann, M. E. (2003). Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. Molecular Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-498-4%3A33

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.