The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Histones and Nucleosome Reconstitution
Abstract
In vitro studies on nucleosome core particles (NCPs) and nucleosomes have generally been limited to the use of histone proteins isolated from chromatin. Numerous reliable and well-established methods have been described of obtaining single histone proteins in significant quantity (e.g., refs. 1 and 2 , and references therein). Briefly, the histone complexes (histone octamer, or histone tetramer and histone dimer) are isolated from “long chromatin,” which is extracted from nuclei. The histone complexes can be further fractionated into individual histone proteins. This approach suffers from several disadvantages. First, the procedure is time-consuming and depends on the availability of fresh tissue or blood from the organism of choice. Second, histone proteins isolated from natural sources are often degraded by contaminating proteases ( 3 ). Third, histone isotypes and posttranslational modifications of histone proteins give rise to heterogeneity. The extent of heterogeneity and modification strongly depend on the type and developmental state of the tissue from which chromatin is isolated and can vary significantly between different batches. Fourth, and most important, only naturally occurring histone proteins can be obtained by this method. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chang, X. B., & Wilson, J. H. (1986) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.58.2.393-401.1986 · Cited by 29
Cited by
Organization of Chromatin by Intrinsic and Regulated Phase Separation
Gibson, B. A., Doolittle, L. K., Schneider, M. W. G., Jensen, L. E., Gamarra, N., Henry, L., Gerlich, D. W., Redding, S., & Rosen, M. K. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.037 · Cited by 1,072
Deciphering the Transcriptional Histone Acetylation Code for a Human Gene
Agalioti, T., Chen, G., & Thanos, D. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01077-2 · Cited by 638
Chemically ubiquitylated histone H2B stimulates hDot1L-mediated intranucleosomal methylation
McGinty, R. K., Kim, J., Chatterjee, C., Roeder, R. G., & Muir, T. W. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06906 · Cited by 563
Chromatin Fiber Folding: Requirement for the Histone H4 N-terminal Tail
Dorigo, B., Schalch, T., Bystricky, K., & Richmond, T. J. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00025-1 · Cited by 526
Self-citationRNA Binding to CBP Stimulates Histone Acetylation and Transcription
Bose, D. A., Donahue, G., Reinberg, D., Shiekhattar, R., Bonasio, R., & Berger, S. L. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.020 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J., & Richmond, T. J.
- Venue
- Chromatin Protocols
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2003-11-14
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 1-16
- OpenAlex
- W134483022
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expression and Purification of Recombinant Histones and Nucleosome Reconstitution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1385/1-59259-681-9:1
- The paper
- Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J., & Richmond, T. J. (2003). Expression and Purification of Recombinant Histones and Nucleosome Reconstitution. Chromatin Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-681-9%3A1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.