Cited by 42Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BDNF and COMT Polymorphisms: Relation to Memory Phenotypes in Young Adults With Childhood-Onset Mood Disorder

Strauss, J., Barr, C. L., George, C. J., Ryan, C. M., King, N., Shaikh, S., Kovacs, M., Kennedy, J. L.·2004·NeuroMolecular Medicine

Abstract

Recent investigations in several species have suggested a role for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in memory, which may be mediated by the influence of BDNF on neuronal plasticity in the hippocampus. BDNF polymorphisms have also been associated with mood disorders. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) metabolizes dopamine and has been implicated in prefrontal function, another area of the brain relevant for memory. In a sample of 63 young adults with a history of childhood-onset mood disorder, we typed three BDNF polymorphisms, including the BDNF Val66Met single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and the COMT Val108/158Met SNP. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to test the association between BDNF and COMT markers and measures of declarative memory. Variants at the three BDNF markers and one COMT marker were not associated with declarative memory function p-values ranged from 0.25 to 0.98. Higher IQ (F = 6.18, df = 4, 58, p = 0.0003) and female gender (F = 4.41, df = 4, 58, p = 0.0035) were associated with more optimal performance on the memory tasks. This study did not provide evidence supporting an association between BDNF and COMT genes and declarative memory phenotypes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/nmm:5:3:181

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strauss, J., Barr, C. L., George, C. J., Ryan, C. M., King, N., Shaikh, S., Kovacs, M., & Kennedy, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, J. L.
Venue
NeuroMolecular Medicine
Published
2004
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
181-192
ISSN
1535-1084 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047784996
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroMolecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P01 MH56193-06, P01MH056193)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, catechol-O-methyltransferase, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, bipolar disorder, depression, declarative memory, genetic association, IQ, sex differences, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Child, Dopamine, Female, Gene Frequency, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Methionine, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, Sex Factors, Valine, Age of Onset, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Mood Disorders, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review