Looking for Love in All the White Places: A Study of Skin Color Preferences on Indian Matrimonial and Mate-Seeking Websites
Abstract
A preference for light skinned females is a global bias that affects all areas of human relationships, especially in marital mate selection. Further intensified by the meteoric rise in Internet dating and mate selection, this bias often serves an invalidating function for darker-skinned women. This study (1) analyzed profiles and preferences of brides and grooms (N=200), and (2) coded success story wedding photos (N=200) posted on four Indian matrimonial websites. Results showed an overwhelming bias among males for brides lighter-skinned than themselves. Males were also more likely than females to state a preference for skin color in their prospective brides, and to use qualitative words like beautiful and lovely to describe their preferred match. Most significantly, the success story wedding photos consistently had lighter-skinned brides than grooms. Dark-skinned women were almost non-existent in these success stories. This research points to a technology-abetted intensification of colorism. That is to say that the powerful profile menu options and the visual imagery of predominantly light-skinned, successful brides illustrated on current websites visually reinforce the invalidation of dark skinned women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heterosexual men of colour often perpetuate colourism by demonstrating it in their choice of partners, or in their descriptions of what they consider attractive in women.
“Heterosexual men of colour often perpetuate colourism by demonstrating it in their choice of partners, or in their descriptions of what they consider attractive in women (hooks, 2003; Jha and Adelman, 2009; Berry and Duke, 2013), as can be seen on Twitter.”
From Colourism and the Politics of Beauty (2014) · cites this paper as Jha and Adelman, 2009
Women with dark skin are at a disadvantage because skin shade is central to assessments of beauty, with light skin operating as a form of symbolic capital that is converted into economic capital and advantage in the 'heterosexual market'.
“However, women with dark skin are at a disadvantage because skin shade is central to assessments of beauty, with light skin operating as a form of symbolic capital that is converted into economic capital and advantage in the ' heterosexual market ' (Glenn, 2008; Jha and Adelman, 2009).”
From Colourism and the Politics of Beauty (2014) · cites this paper as Jha and Adelman, 2009
Cites
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806 · see citing works
Hill, M. E. (2002) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3090169 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Colourism and the Politics of Beauty
Phoenix, A. (2014) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.2014.18 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
India's Color Complex: One Day's Worth of Matrimonials
Utley, T. J., & Darity, W. (2016) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1007/s12114-016-9233-x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jha, S., & Adelman, M.
- Affiliations
- Seattle University (US)
- Venue
- Studies in South Asian Film & Media
- Publisher
- Intellect
- Published
- 2009-05-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-83
- ISSN
- 1756-4921 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-493X
- OpenAlex
- W1969393991
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in South Asian Film & Media (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- skin color preference, colorism, online dating, mate choice, marriage, visual representation, gender bias, Indian diaspora
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review