The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later
Open accessAbstract
Only five years after the initiation of transgenic research in plants, gene targeting (GT) was achieved for the first time in tobacco. Unfortunately, the frequency of targeted integration via homologous recombination (HR) was so low in comparison to random integration that GT could not be established as a feasible technique in higher plants. It took another 25 years and great effort to develop the knowledge and tools necessary to overcome this challenge, at least for some plant species. In some cases, the overexpression of proteins involved in HR or the use of negative selectable markers improved GT to a certain extent. An effective solution to this problem was developed in 1996, when a sequence-specific endonuclease was used to induce a double-strand break (DSB) at the target locus. Thus, GT frequencies were enhanced dramatically. Thereafter, the main limitation was the absence of tools needed to induce DSBs at specific sites in the genome. Such tools became available with the development of zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), and a breakthrough was achieved in 2005 when ZFNs were used to target a marker gene in tobacco. Subsequently, endogenous loci were targeted in maize, tobacco and Arabidopsis. Recently, our toolbox for genetic engineering has expanded with the addition of more types of site-specific endonucleases, meganucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and the CRISPR/Cas system. We assume that targeted genome modifications will become routine in the near future in crop plants using these nucleases along with the newly developed in planta GT technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prime genome editing in rice and wheat
Lin, Q., Zong, Y., Xue, C., Wang, S., Jin, S., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Anzalone, A. V., Raguram, A., Doman, J. L., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x · Cited by 873
A CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox for Multiplexed Plant Genome Editing and Transcriptional Regulation
Lowder, L. G., Zhang, D., Baltes, N. J., Paul, J. W., Tang, X., Zheng, X., Voytas, D. F., Hsieh, T.-F., Zhang, Y., & Qi, Y. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00636 · Cited by 707
Schiml, S., Fauser, F., & Puchta, H. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12704 · Cited by 342
Self-citationGenetic Engineering for Disease Resistance in Plants: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives
Dong, O. X., & Ronald, P. C. (2019) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.18.01224 · Cited by 309
Current status and perspectives of genome editing technology for microalgae
Jeon, S., Lim, J.-M., Lee, H.-G., Shin, S.-E., Kang, N. K., Park, Y.-I., Oh, H.-M., Jeong, W.-J., Jeong, B.-R., & Chang, Y. K. (2017) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0957-z · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Puchta, H., & Fauser, F.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- EHU Press
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6-7-8
- Pages
- 629-637
- ISSN
- 0214-6282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973673212
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1387/ijdb.130194hp
- The paper
- Puchta, H., & Fauser, F. (2013). Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.130194hp
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.