Cited by 60Colonialism, slavery, and tradeRace, History, and American SocietyMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Black Suffering for/from Anti-trafficking Advocacy

Open access
Beutin, Lyndsey P.·2017·Anti-Trafficking Review

Abstract

This article analyses the images that Antislavery Usable Past creates to promote its cause of ‘making the antislavery past usable for contemporary abolition’. Drawing on collective memory studies, I discuss the political implications of how pasts are used for present issues. I argue that Antislavery Usable Past appropriates black suffering by reducing the memory and imagery of slavery to objects that are compatible with the anti-trafficking narrative, without regard for the ongoing black liberation struggle. I conclude by discussing the troubling trend of incorporating anti-trafficking exhibitions into institutions that preserve the history of slavery and abolition. Such inclusions redirect the history lessons of slavery away from understanding and addressing anti-blackness in the present and towards supporting advocacy campaigns articulated in the logics that underpinned racial chattel slavery in the first place.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14197/atr.20121792

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Slavery often existed primarily as a legal status wherein property rights could be exercised over a person and upheld through legal or equivalent customary institutions.

    “often existed primarily as a legal status wherein property rights could be exercised over a person and upheld through legal or equivalent customary institutions. 9”

    From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as [9]

    The White Accumulation section describes enslaved people being sold and a slaver accumulating wealth through another enslaved person. That supports the claim's point about treating people as property, but our copy does not describe slavery primarily as a legal status or say that property rights were upheld by law or customary institutions. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beutin, L. P.
Corresponding author
Beutin, Lyndsey P.
Venue
Anti-Trafficking Review
Published
2017-09-21
Issue
9
Pages
14-30
ISSN
  • 2286-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-0113
OpenAlex
W2758191528
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anti-Trafficking Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Anti-Trafficking Review (Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Keywords
anti-trafficking advocacy, Black suffering, slavery, collective memory, abolition, anti-Blackness, historical memory, Black liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review