Cited by 91Linguistics and Language AnalysisLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

A theoretical review of the speech act of suggesting: towards a taxonomy for its use in FLT

Open access
Martínez Flor, Alicia·2005·Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a taxonomy of linguistic realisation strategies concerning the speech act of suggesting. In this regard, we will first provide a definition of this particular speech act, outlining its main characteristics and differentiating it from other directive speech acts, such as requests. Second, we will review the research conducted on suggestions by examining studies from both the cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics fields. Third, we will present the taxonomy we have drawn up on the basis of two theoretical frameworks, namely those of speech act and politeness theories, as well as findings from previous studies on this particular speech act. Finally, we will propose an example of a teaching approach in which this taxonomy could be implemented in order to develop learners' pragmatic competence when making suggestions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14198/raei.2005.18.08

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, Beverly S. Hartford, Rebecca Mahan-Taylor, Mary J. Morgan and Dudley W. Reynolds (1991): "Developing pragmatic awareness: Closingtheconversation". ELT Journal 45: 4-15.
  2. Hu, Wenzhong and Cornelius L. Grove (1991): Encountering the Chínese. Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press.
  3. Koike, Dale April( 1994): "NegationinSpanishandEnglishsuggestionsandrequests: Mitigating effects?" Journal of Pragmatics 21: 513-526. . (1996): "Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning". In S. M. Gass and J. Neu, eds., Speech acts across cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 257-281.
  4. Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson (1981): Mandarín reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  5. Mándala, Susan (1999): "Exiting advice". In L. F. Bouton, ed., Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 9. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 89-111.
  6. Matsumura, Shoichi (2001): "Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialization". Language learning 51: 635-679. . (2003): "Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2". Applied Linguistics 24(4): 465-491.
  7. Rose, Kenneth R. (1993): "Sociolinguistic consciousness-raising through video". The Language Teacher 17: 7-9. . (1994): "Pragmatic consciousness-raising inanEFL context". InL. F. Bouton and Y. Kachru, eds., Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 5. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 52-63. . (1997): "Pragmatics in the classroom: Theoretical concerns and practicalpossibilities".
  8. Tsui, Amy (1994): English conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez Flor, A.
Venue
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
Published
2005-11-15
Issue
18
Pages
167
ISSN
  • 0214-4808 (ISSN-L)
  • 2171-861X
OpenAlex
W38484109
Cited by
87
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universitat Jaume I
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
suggestion, speech acts, directive speech acts, requests, politeness theory, speech act theory, interlanguage pragmatics, cross-cultural pragmatics, pragmatic competence, foreign language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review