Cited by 75Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

CLINICAL EFFECTS OF TRAMIPROSATE IN APOE4/4 HOMOZYGOUS PATIENTS WITH MILD ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE SUGGEST DISEASE MODIFICATION POTENTIAL

Open access
Abushakra, S., Porsteinsson, A., Scheltens, P., Sadowsky, C., Vellas, B., Cummings, J., Gauthier, S., Hey, J.A. +4 more·2017·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patients homozygous for the APOE4 allele (APOE4/4) have a distinct clinical and biological phenotype with high levels of beta amyloid (Aβ) pathology and toxic Aβ oligomers. Tramiprosate, an oral agent that inhibits Aβ monomer aggregation into toxic oligomers, was evaluated in two Phase 3 Mild to Moderate AD studies which did not show efficacy in the overall population. Re-analyses of these trials showed the most consistent clinical benefits in APOE4/4 patients. We analyzed efficacy in the APOE4/4 patients with Mild disease. Objectives: To determine the optimal stage of AD for future trials in APOE4/4 homozygotes. Design: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-arm multi-center studies of 78-weeks duration. Setting: Academic Alzheimer’s disease centers, community-based memory clinics, and neuropsychiatric research sites. Participants: Participants included 2,025 AD patients with MMSE 16-26. Approximately 13-15% had APOE4/4 genotype (N= 147 and 110 per study), mean age 71.1 years, 56% females. Almost all were on stable symptomatic drugs. Intervention: Randomized subjects received oral placebo, 100mg BID, or 150mg BID of tramiprosate. Measurements: Co-primary outcomes were change from baseline in the ADAS-cog11 and CDR-SB. Disability assessment for dementia (DAD) was a secondary outcome. Results: In APOE4/4 homozygotes receiving 150mg BID tramiprosate, efficacy in the traditional Mild AD patients (MMSE 20-26) was higher than the overall group (MMSE 16-26) and efficacy in the Mild patients (MMSE 22-26) was highest. Tramiprosate benefits compared to placebo on ADAS-cog, CDR-SB, and DAD were 125%, 81% and 71%, respectively (p<0.02). The Mild subgroup (MMSE 22-26) showed cognitive stabilization with no decline over 78 weeks, both ADAS-cog and DAD effects increased over time. Tramiprosate safety in APOE4/4 patients was favorable. Most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, depression and decreased weight. Conclusions: The Mild subgroup of APOE4/4 AD patients (MMSE 22-26) showed larger benefits on the high dose of tramiprosate than the overall Mild and Moderate group. Consistent with its preclinical effects on Aβ oligomers, tramiprosate seemed to stabilize cognitive performance, supporting its disease modification potential. Confirmatory studies using ALZ-801, an improved pro-drug formulation of tramiprosate, will target APOE4/4 patients with Mild AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14283/jpad.2017.26

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mild AD patients, clinical benefits of tramiprosate treatment were more pronounced in APOE4/4 carriers rather than APOE4/3 or non-carriers, in whom there was no benefit.

    “In mild AD patients, the clinical benefits of tramiprosate treatment were more pronounced in homozygosis (APOE4/4) carriers rather than in heterozygosis (APOE4/3) or non-carriers (APOE3/3), in whom there was no benefit [166].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abushakra, S., Porsteinsson, A., Scheltens, P., Sadowsky, C., Vellas, B., Cummings, J., Gauthier, S., Hey, J. A., Power, A., Wang, P., Shen, L., & Tolar, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Université de Toulouse (FR)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging (CA)
Corresponding author
Abushakra, S.
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
1-8
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901927471
Cited by
75
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-01-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
tramiprosate, Alzheimer's disease, disease modification, amyloid-beta oligomers, amyloid beta aggregation inhibition, mild Alzheimer's disease, Mini-Mental State Examination, ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB, Disability Assessment for Dementia, subgroup analysis, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Taurine, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents, Apolipoprotein E4, Protein Aggregation, Pathological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review