Cited by 105Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesMedical Coding and Health Information

Detection Rates of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care for the United States Medicare Population

Open access
Liu, Ying, Jun, H., Becker, A., Wallick, C., Mattke, S.·2024·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Existing evidence points to substantial gaps in detecting mild cognitive impairment in primary care but is based on limited or self-reported data. The recent emergence of disease-modifying treatments for the Alzheimer's disease, the most common etiology of mild cognitive impairment, calls for a systematic assessment of detection rates in primary care. OBJECTIVES: The current study aims to examine detection rates for mild cognitive impairment among primary care clinicians and practices in the United States using Medicare claims and encounter data. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Medicare administrative data. PARTICIPANTS: The study sample includes a total of 226,756 primary care clinicians and 54,597 practices that had at least 25 patients aged 65 or older, who were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service or a Medicare Advantage plan between 2017 and 2019. MEASUREMENTS: The detection rate for mild cognitive impairment is assessed as the ratio between the observed diagnosis rate of a clinician or practice as documented in the data, and the expected rate based on a predictive model. RESULTS: The average detection rates for mild cognitive impairment is 0.08 (interquartile range=0.00-0.02) for both clinicians and practices, suggesting that only about 8% of expected cases were diagnosed on average. Only 0.1% of clinicians and practices had diagnosis rates within the expected range. CONCLUSIONS: Mild cognitive impairment is vastly underdiagnosed, pointing to an urgent need to improve early detection in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14283/jpad.2023.131

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among over 200,000 clinicians and practices surveyed, only 0.1% had diagnosis rates within the expected range.

    “Among over 200,000 clinicians and practices surveyed, only 0.1% had diagnosis rates within the expected range”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

    The Results (Tables 1–2) report 226,756 clinicians and 54,597 practices, with 0.1% of each having diagnosis rates no different from the expected rate. However, the Methods (Patient and Clinician Samples from Medicare Data) and Discussion describe an analysis of Medicare administrative data, not a survey of clinicians or practices. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only 8% of older Americans living with MCI receive a diagnosis.

    “One recent study estimates that only 8% of older Americans living with MCI receive a diagnosis.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

  • The low diagnosis rates are likely due to limited expertise and confidence and other factors.

    “likely due to limited expertise and confidence and other factors discussed on the following pages”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

  • There may be as many as 8 million people with undiagnosed MCI.

    “suggesting there may be as many as 8 million people with undiagnosed MCI”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

  • A recent study of Medicare beneficiaries found that only about 8% of expected mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cases are diagnosed on average.

    “A recent study of Medicare beneficiaries found that only about 8% of expected mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cases are diagnosed on average, suggesting there may be as many as 8 million people with undiagnosed MCI”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Jun, H., Becker, A., Wallick, C., & Mattke, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Genentech (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Ying
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
7-12
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387960558
Cited by
105
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 21
FWCI
21.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Genentech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, underdiagnosis, primary care, Medicare, older adults, Alzheimer's disease, early detection, diagnostic rate, disease-modifying therapy, Medicare Advantage, fee-for-service
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Medicare, Humans, Primary Health Care, United States, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review