CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preventing Plagiarism and Fostering Academic Integrity: A Practical Approach

Open access
Brown, Nicole, Janssen, Rosalind·2017·Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
DOI 10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.245
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although plagiarism, cheating and academic integrity receive increased attention, literature provides little practical advice or strategies on how to approach these topics with students. In this paper we describe a case study in relation to an intervention we have developed to help our students prevent plagiarism and to foster academic integrity amongst our studentship. In the two hour workshop students are supported in gaining a deeper understanding of what plagiarism is and provides them with practical examples of how plagiarism can be avoided. In the context of the workshop plagiarism is discussed in its many forms of the intentional and unintentional stealing or appropriating of ideas that are not credited accordingly (Helgesson & Eriksson, 2015). The intervention also encompasses discussions around academic integrity and what academic integrity means in theory and in practice. The six steps in our intervention are a sorting activity (what is plagiarism?), the presentation of real cases (what is the impact of plagiarism?), practising to synthesise ideas (how can I prevent plagiarism), the role of plagiarism-detection software such as Turnitin (how can I check for plagiarism?), the formulation of an integrity code and a summary of the content covered in the session (what do I know now?). The intervention draws upon research and practical experiences and is designed in such a way that with adaptations it can be delivered to all levels of students and courses. Following the presentation of the individual elements of the workshop the article concludes with a brief outline of a research project in relation to our workshop, which will be used to inform our further development of the intervention but also to provide a more formal evaluation of its effectiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.245

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.010 · DOI
  2. Amsberry, D. (2009). Deconstructing plagiarism: International students and textual borrowing practices. The Reference Librarian, 51(1), 31-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763870903362183 · DOI
  3. Anderson, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). Psychology of Academic Cheating. London: Elsevier.
  4. Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., & Students on the Qualitative Research Methods Course Unit. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381034 · DOI
  5. Bamford, J., & Sergiou, K. (2005). International students and plagiarism: An analysis of the reasons for plagiarism among international foundation students. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 17-22.
  6. Blum, S. D. (2010). My Word! Plagiarism and College Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  7. Carroll, J., & Oxford Centre for Staff Development (2002). A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
  8. Childers, D., & Bruton, S. (2016). “Should it be considered plagiarism?” Student perceptions of complex citation issues. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(1), 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9250-6 · DOI
  9. Culwin, F., & Lancaster, T. (2001). Plagiarism issues for higher education. Vine, 31(2), 36-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720010804005 · DOI
  10. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1901_3 · DOI
  11. Draper, M. J., Ibezim, V., & Newton P. M. (2017). Are Essay Mills committing fraud? An analysis of their behaviours vs the 2006 Fraud Act (UK). International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1), 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0014-5 · DOI
  12. Duff, A. H., Rogers, D. P., & Harris, M. B. (2006). International engineering students – Avoiding plagiarism through understanding the Western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 673-681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600911753 · DOI
  13. Fish, R., & Hura, G. (2013). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 33-45.
  14. Glendinning, I. (2014). Responses to student plagiarism in higher education across Europe. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 4-20.
  15. Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36(3), 337-352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.01.004 · DOI
  16. Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. U. (2015). Student perceptions of self-plagiarism: A multi-University exploratory study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 91-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9228-4 · DOI
  17. Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics & Behavior, 15(3), 213-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2 · DOI
  18. Heitman, E., & Litewka, S. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(1), 104-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2015). Plagiarism in research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18(1), 91-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9583-8 · DOI
  20. Landau, J. D., Druen, P. B., & Arcuri, J. A. (2002). Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 29(2), 112-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2902_06 · DOI
  21. Lang, M. L. (2013). Cheating Lessons: Learning from Academic Dishonesty. Harvard: Harvard University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726239 · DOI
  22. Leask, B. (2006). Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor – Implications for academic staff development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 183-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262486 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Love, P. G., & Simmons, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal, 32, 539-551.
  24. Martin, B. (1994). Plagiarism: A misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics, 3(2), 36-47.
  25. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments. A qualitative investigation, The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211-234. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2649128 · DOI
  26. O’Neill, H. M., & Pfeiffer, C. (2012). The impact of honour codes and perceptions of cheating on academic cheating behaviours, especially for MBA bound undergraduates, Accounting Education, 21(3), 231-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2011.590012 · DOI
  27. Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – Literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677 · DOI
  28. Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291-306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000241760 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized?. The Psychological Record, 47(1), 113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395215 · DOI
  30. Scanlon, P. M. (2003). Student online plagiarism: How do we respond?. College Teaching, 51(4), 161-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596432 · DOI
  31. Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing…’: A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465-479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701563104 · DOI
  32. Stevens, G. E., & Stevens, F. W. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow's managers revisited: How and why students cheat. Journal of Education for Business, 63(1), 24-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1987.10117269 · DOI
  33. Straw, D. (2002). The plagiarism of generation "why not?". Community College Week, 8July, 14 (24), 4-7.
  34. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005). Pandora’s box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007 · DOI
  35. Wager, E. (2014). Defining and responding to plagiarism. Learned Publishing, 27(1), 33-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1087/20140105 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 61

Metadata

Authors
Brown, N., & Janssen, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Brown, Nicole
  • Janssen, Rosalind
ORCID
Brown, Nicole
Venue
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
Publisher
University of the Highlands and Islands
Published
2017-03-07
Volume
5
Issue
3
ISSN
2051-9788 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.245
OpenAlex
W2741626095
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 1
FWCI
23.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
plagiarism avoidance, academic integrity, academic dishonesty, plagiarism detection software, Turnitin, student education, intervention design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing Plagiarism and Fostering Academic Integrity: A Practical Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.245
The paper
Brown, N., & Janssen, R. (2017). Preventing Plagiarism and Fostering Academic Integrity: A Practical Approach. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.245